Literature DB >> 10548211

A controlled trial of low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) versus unfractionated heparin as anticoagulant during continuous venovenous hemodialysis with filtration.

J H Reeves1, A R Cumming, L Gallagher, J L O'Brien, J D Santamaria.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, safety, and cost of fixed-dose low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) with adjusted-dose unfractionated heparin as anticoagulant for continuous hemofiltration.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
SETTING: University-affiliated adult intensive care unit PATIENTS: All patients requiring continuous hemofiltration for acute renal failure or systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) were eligible. Fifty-seven patients were enrolled. Eleven were excluded, seven because of major protocol violations and four died before hemofiltration.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients received continuous venovenous hemodialysis with filtration with prefilter replacement at 500 mL/hr and countercurrent dialysate at 1000 mL/hr. Filters were primed with normal saline containing anticoagulant. Dalteparin-treated patients received a commencement bolus of 20 units/kg and a maintenance infusion at 10 units/kg/hr. Heparin-treated patients received a commencement bolus of 2000-5000 units and a maintenance infusion at 10 units/kg/hr, titrated to achieve an activated partial thromboplastin time in the patient of 70-80 secs.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome measure--time to failure of the hemofilter--was compared using survival analysis. Twenty-two patients (13 with acute renal failure and nine with SIRS; total, 41 filters) were randomized to heparin. Twenty-five patients (16 with acute renal failure and nine with SIRS; total, 41 filters) were randomized to dalteparin. Mean (SE) activated partial thromboplastin time in the heparin group was 79 (4.3) secs. Mean (SE) anti-factor-Xa activity in the six patients given dalteparin who were assayed was 0.49 (0.07). Mean (SE) prehemofiltration platelet count was 225 (35.5) x 10(9) for heparin and 178 (18.1) x 10(9) for dalteparin (p = .24, unpaired Student's t-test). Mean (SE) prehemofiltration hemoglobin was 11.4 (0.61) g/dL for heparin and 10.6 (0.38) g/dL for dalteparin (p = .31, unpaired Student's t-test). PRIMARY OUTCOME: There was no significant difference in the time to failure between the two groups (p = .75, log rank test). For dalteparin, Kaplan-Meier (K-M) mean (SE) time to failure of the hemofilter was 46.8 (5.03) hrs. For heparin, K-M mean (SE) time to failure was 51.7 (7.51) hrs. The 95% CI for difference in mean time to failure was -13 to 23 hrs. The power of this study to detect a 50% change in filter life was >90%. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Mean (SE) reduction in platelet count during hemofiltration was 63 (25.8) x 10(9) for heparin and 41.8 (26.6) x 10(9) for dalteparin (p = .57, unpaired Student's t-test). Eight patients given dalteparin and four patients given heparin had screening for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; three of the dalteparin patients and one of the heparin patients were positive (p = 1.0, Fisher's exact test). There were three episodes of trivial bleeding and two episodes of significant bleeding for dalteparin, and there were three episodes of trivial bleeding and four episodes of significant bleeding for heparin (p = .53, chi-square test). The mean (SE) decrease in hemoglobin concentration during hemofiltration was 0.51 (0.54) g/dL for heparin and 0.28 (0.49) g/dL for dalteparin (p = .75, unpaired Student's t-test). The mean (SE) packed-cell transfusion volume during hemofiltration was 309 (128) mL for heparin and 290 (87) mL for dalteparin (p = .90, unpaired Student's t-test). Daily costs, including coagulation assays, of hemofiltration were approximately 10% higher using dalteparin than with heparin.
CONCLUSIONS: Fixed-dose dalteparin provided identical filter life, comparable safety, but increased total daily cost compared with adjusted-dose heparin. Unfractionated heparin remains our anticoagulant of choice for continuous hemofiltration in intensive care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10548211     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199910000-00026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  21 in total

Review 1.  Anticoagulation strategies in continuous renal replacement therapy: can the choice be evidence based?

Authors:  H M Oudemans-van Straaten; J P J Wester; A C J M de Pont; M R C Schetz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  CRRT - still far from being a standardised BEST treatment?

Authors:  Michael Joannidis; Lui G Forni
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: Who, When, Why, and How.

Authors:  Srijan Tandukar; Paul M Palevsky
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Effect of severe thrombocytopenia on patient outcome after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Chaker Ben Hamida; Jean-Yves Lauzet; Saida Rézaiguia-Delclaux; Christophe Duvoux; Daniel Cherqui; Philippe Duvaldestin; François Stéphan
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Recurring extracorporeal circuit clotting during continuous renal replacement therapy resolved after single-session therapeutic plasma exchange.

Authors:  Tibor Fülöp; Adrian Cosmin; Luis A Juncos
Journal:  J Clin Apher       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.821

Review 6.  The Japanese clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury 2016.

Authors:  Kent Doi; Osamu Nishida; Takashi Shigematsu; Tomohito Sadahiro; Noritomo Itami; Kunitoshi Iseki; Yukio Yuzawa; Hirokazu Okada; Daisuke Koya; Hideyasu Kiyomoto; Yugo Shibagaki; Kenichi Matsuda; Akihiko Kato; Terumasa Hayashi; Tomonari Ogawa; Tatsuo Tsukamoto; Eisei Noiri; Shigeo Negi; Koichi Kamei; Hirotsugu Kitayama; Naoki Kashihara; Toshiki Moriyama; Yoshio Terada
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.801

Review 7.  Unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparins for avoiding heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in postoperative patients.

Authors:  Daniela R Junqueira; Liliane M Zorzela; Edson Perini
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-21

8.  Citrate anticoagulation in pediatric continuous venovenous hemofiltration.

Authors:  Nahum Elhanan; Peter Skippen; Gabrielle Nuthall; Gordon Krahn; Michael Seear
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 3.714

9.  Continuous renal replacement therapy: a worldwide practice survey. The beginning and ending supportive therapy for the kidney (B.E.S.T. kidney) investigators.

Authors:  Shigehiko Uchino; Rinaldo Bellomo; Hiroshi Morimatsu; Stanislao Morgera; Miet Schetz; Ian Tan; Catherine Bouman; Ettiene Macedo; Noel Gibney; Ashita Tolwani; Heleen Oudemans-van Straaten; Claudio Ronco; John A Kellum
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Enoxaparin vs. unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration: a randomized controlled crossover study.

Authors:  Michael Joannidis; Jordan Kountchev; Markus Rauchenzauner; Nicola Schusterschitz; Hanno Ulmer; Andreas Mayr; Romuald Bellmann
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.