OBJECTIVE: To determine the acute hemodynamic effect of hypertonic saline and/or colloid solutions as volume resuscitation in postoperative mitral valve repair patients. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized trial. SETTING:Postoperative cardiac intensive care unit of Broussais Hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-six patients who underwent mitral valve repair were prospectively studied. Two patients were excluded during the study. INTERVENTIONS: During the immediate postoperative period, when wedge pressure decreases to <8 mm Hg, patients were randomly assigned to receive 250 mL of either hypertonic saline7.2%-hydroxyethyl starch 6% (molecular weight, 200,000; hydroxyethylation ratio, 0.5) solution (HS-HES group), hypertonic saline 7.2% solution (HS group), or hydroxyethyl starch 6% solution (HES group). The infusion was completed within 15 mins. No additional volume was infused throughout the study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Standard hemodynamic measurements and echocardiographic data demonstrated that HS-HES and HS induced a higher increase in left ventricular end-diastolic area than HES. In the HS-HES and HS groups, systemic vascular resistances decreased significantly and end-systolic area tended to decrease. In the HES group, systemic vascular resistances did not change and end-systolic area tended to increase. Accordingly, ejection fraction increased significantly by 21% and 18% with HS-HES (from 50.5 +/- 5.5 to 61.2 +/- 4.8) and HS (from 49.7 +/- 3.6 to 58.8 +/- 3.3), respectively, and did not change with HES. A major increase in cardiac index was observed after hypertonic solutions infusion, from 2.9 +/- 0.3 to 4.1 +/- 0.4 L/min/m2 in the HS-HES group and from 2.7 +/- 0.3 to 3.8 +/- 0.4 L/min/m2 in the HS group. Then, cardiac index progressively returned to baseline values within the 3 hrs after the infusion. No significant difference was observed between HS-HES and HS. In these groups, plasma sodium increased significantly after the infusion and remained higher than baseline values throughout the study. Adverse events were observed only with hypertonic solution administration: hypotensive episodes, sudden increases in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and ventricular arrhythmias. These side effects are likely attributable to a too-high dose and/or rate of infusion. All patients included in the study were discharged from the hospital before the 10th postoperative day. CONCLUSION: We conclude that in patients who have undergone mitral valve repair, postoperative infusion ofhypertonic saline solutions increases left ventricular preload and left ventricular ejection fraction. The use of these hypertonic solutions may be of interest in patients with valvular cardiomyopathy. A titrated dose and a low rate of infusion may substantially improve the safety.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the acute hemodynamic effect of hypertonicsaline and/or colloid solutions as volume resuscitation in postoperative mitral valve repair patients. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized trial. SETTING: Postoperative cardiac intensive care unit of Broussais Hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-six patients who underwent mitral valve repair were prospectively studied. Two patients were excluded during the study. INTERVENTIONS: During the immediate postoperative period, when wedge pressure decreases to <8 mm Hg, patients were randomly assigned to receive 250 mL of either hypertonicsaline 7.2%-hydroxyethyl starch 6% (molecular weight, 200,000; hydroxyethylation ratio, 0.5) solution (HS-HES group), hypertonicsaline 7.2% solution (HS group), or hydroxyethyl starch 6% solution (HES group). The infusion was completed within 15 mins. No additional volume was infused throughout the study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Standard hemodynamic measurements and echocardiographic data demonstrated that HS-HES and HS induced a higher increase in left ventricular end-diastolic area than HES. In the HS-HES and HS groups, systemic vascular resistances decreased significantly and end-systolic area tended to decrease. In the HES group, systemic vascular resistances did not change and end-systolic area tended to increase. Accordingly, ejection fraction increased significantly by 21% and 18% with HS-HES (from 50.5 +/- 5.5 to 61.2 +/- 4.8) and HS (from 49.7 +/- 3.6 to 58.8 +/- 3.3), respectively, and did not change with HES. A major increase in cardiac index was observed after hypertonic solutions infusion, from 2.9 +/- 0.3 to 4.1 +/- 0.4 L/min/m2 in the HS-HES group and from 2.7 +/- 0.3 to 3.8 +/- 0.4 L/min/m2 in the HS group. Then, cardiac index progressively returned to baseline values within the 3 hrs after the infusion. No significant difference was observed between HS-HES and HS. In these groups, plasma sodium increased significantly after the infusion and remained higher than baseline values throughout the study. Adverse events were observed only with hypertonic solution administration: hypotensive episodes, sudden increases in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and ventricular arrhythmias. These side effects are likely attributable to a too-high dose and/or rate of infusion. All patients included in the study were discharged from the hospital before the 10th postoperative day. CONCLUSION: We conclude that in patients who have undergone mitral valve repair, postoperative infusion of hypertonicsaline solutions increases left ventricular preload and left ventricular ejection fraction. The use of these hypertonic solutions may be of interest in patients with valvular cardiomyopathy. A titrated dose and a low rate of infusion may substantially improve the safety.
Authors: Alexander A Hanke; Stephanie Maschler; Herbert Schöchl; Felix Flöricke; Klaus Görlinger; Klaus Zanger; Peter Kienbaum Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2011-02-10 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Sharon R Lewis; Michael W Pritchard; David Jw Evans; Andrew R Butler; Phil Alderson; Andrew F Smith; Ian Roberts Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-08-03