Literature DB >> 10548193

The influence of access to a private attending physician on the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in the intensive care unit.

M H Kollef1, S Ward.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of patient access to a private attending physician on the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in a medical intensive care unit (ICU).
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: A university-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 501 consecutive patients admitted to the medical ICU during a 5-month period.
INTERVENTIONS: None
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among patients dying in the medical ICU, those without a private attending physician (n = 26) were statistically more likely to undergo the active withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies than patients with a private attending physician (n = 87) (80.8% vs. 29.9%; relative risk = 2.70; 95% confidence interval = 1.86-3.92; p < .001). Despite having similar predicted mortality rates by Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (60.5% +/- 27.0% vs. 66.1% +/- 21.3%; p = .280), patients dying in the medical ICU without a private attending physician had statistically shorter hospital and ICU lengths of stay, a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, and fewer total hospital costs and charges compared with patients with access to a private attending physician. Multiple logistic regression analysis, controlling for severity of illness, demographic characteristics, and patient diagnoses, demonstrated that lack of access to a private attending physician (adjusted odds ratio = 23.10; 95% confidence interval = 9.10-58.57; p < .001) and the presence of a do-not-resuscitate order while in the ICU (adjusted odds ratio = 7.33; 95% confidence interval = 3.69-14.54; p = .004) were the only variables independently associated with the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies before death.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients dying in a medical ICU setting without access to a private attending physician are more likely to undergo the active withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies before death than patients with a private attending physician. Health care providers should be aware of possible variations in the practice of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in their ICUs based on this patient characteristic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10548193     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199910000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  4 in total

Review 1.  Global variability in withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in the intensive care unit: a systematic review.

Authors:  N M Mark; S G Rayner; N J Lee; J R Curtis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Intensivists: don't quit your day job...yet!

Authors:  Gregory A Watson; Louis H Alarcon
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 3.  Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU. Statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003.

Authors:  Jean Carlet; Lambertus G Thijs; Massimo Antonelli; Joan Cassell; Peter Cox; Nicholas Hill; Charles Hinds; Jorge Manuel Pimentel; Konrad Reinhart; Boyd Taylor Thompson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-04-20       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Relationship between staff perceptions of hospital norms and hospital-level end-of-life treatment intensity.

Authors:  Amber E Barnato; James E Bost; Maxwell H Farrell; Judith R Lave; Robert M Arnold; Doris M Rubio; Derek C Angus
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.947

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.