Literature DB >> 10547922

A note on the power provided by sibships of sizes 2, 3, and 4 in genetic covariance modeling of a codominant QTL.

C V Dolan1, D I Boomsma, M C Neale.   

Abstract

The contribution of size 3 and size 4 sibships to power in covariance structure modeling of a codominant QTL is investigated. Power calculations are based on the noncentral chi-square distribution. Sixteen sets of parameter values are considered. Results indicate that size 3 and size 4 sibships provided large increases in power over size 2 sibships. On average a size 3 (4) sibship is 3 (6 to 7) times as informative as a size 2 sibship. The increase in power does not depend on the specific effects sizes of the independent variables in the model. These findings extend results presented by Fulker and Cherny (1996) and Schork (1993). We consider the informativeness of the size 2, 3, and 4 sibships, which differ in the unique configuration of IBD sharing. Three of the 10 size 3 and 7 of the 36 size 4 sibships are particularly informative. The results presented concern random (unselective) sampling but do have implications for selective sampling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10547922     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021687817609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  9 in total

1.  Nonpaternity in linkage studies of extremely discordant sib pairs.

Authors:  Michael C Neale; Benjamin M Neale; Patrick F Sullivan
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-12-14       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Guidelines for genotyping in genomewide linkage studies: single-nucleotide-polymorphism maps versus microsatellite maps.

Authors:  David M Evans; Lon R Cardon
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Notes on Three Decades of Methodology Workshops.

Authors:  Hermine H Maes
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Comparison of Twin and Extended Pedigree Designs for Obtaining Heritability Estimates.

Authors:  Anna R Docherty; William S Kremen; Matthew S Panizzon; Elizabeth C Prom-Wormley; Carol E Franz; Michael J Lyons; Lindon J Eaves; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  EM-random forest and new measures of variable importance for multi-locus quantitative trait linkage analysis.

Authors:  Sophia S F Lee; Lei Sun; Rafal Kustra; Shelley B Bull
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  A genome-wide linkage scan identifies multiple chromosomal regions influencing serum lipid levels in the population on the Samoan islands.

Authors:  Karolina Aberg; Feng Dai; Guangyun Sun; Ember Keighley; Subba Rao Indugula; Linda Bausserman; Satupaitea Viali; John Tuitele; Ranjan Deka; Daniel E Weeks; Stephen T McGarvey
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 5.922

7.  Power calculations using exact data simulation: a useful tool for genetic study designs.

Authors:  Sophie van der Sluis; Conor V Dolan; Michael C Neale; Danielle Posthuma
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  Stability of exploratory multivariate data modeling in longitudinal data.

Authors:  Haydar Sengul; M Michael Barmada
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2003-12-31       Impact factor: 2.797

9.  Behavioral and EEG responses to social evaluation: A two-generation family study on social anxiety.

Authors:  Anita Harrewijn; Melle J W van der Molen; Irene M van Vliet; Renaud L M Tissier; P Michiel Westenberg
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 4.881

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.