Literature DB >> 10547679

Influenza vaccines: present and future.

K Subbarao1.   

Abstract

Immunization is the most feasible method for preventing influenza. Vaccination against influenza is recommended for everyone 65 years of age and older and for persons less than 65 years of age who are at risk for developing complications of influenza. Immune correlates of protection have been established, and a global network is in place to monitor the appearance and circulation of antigenic variants of influenza viruses, as well as the appearance of novel subtypes of influenza A. Antigenic and genetic analyses of circulating viruses and testing of serum from vaccine recipients guide vaccine composition updates. The efficacy of influenza vaccines depends in part on the closeness of the antigenic match between the vaccine strain and the epidemic strain. Currently licensed influenza vaccines are trivalent, formalin-inactivated, egg-derived vaccines; their efficacy ranges from 70 to 90% in young, healthy populations when there is a close antigenic match between vaccine strains and epidemic strains. Development of intranasally administered alternative vaccines and improvement of the existing vaccine are areas of active research. A trivalent, ca live vaccine is the most promising LAIV candidate. In a field trial, efficacy rates of LAIV in young children were 96% against influenza A (H3N2) and 91% against influenza B. However, few data are available to compare this formulation of the trivalent ca live vaccine with the trivalent, inactivated vaccine. Influenza vaccine recommendations will most likely be revised on licensure of LAIV; each vaccine may offer distinct advantages in specific populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10547679     DOI: 10.1016/s0065-3527(08)60371-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Virus Res        ISSN: 0065-3527            Impact factor:   9.937


  6 in total

1.  C3d enhancement of antibodies to hemagglutinin accelerates protection against influenza virus challenge.

Authors:  T M Ross; Y Xu; R A Bright; H L Robinson
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 25.606

2.  Phase I evaluation of intranasal trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine with nontoxigenic Escherichia coli enterotoxin and novel biovector as mucosal adjuvants, using adult volunteers.

Authors:  Iain Stephenson; Maria C Zambon; Anna Rudin; Anthony Colegate; Audino Podda; Roberto Bugarini; Giusseppe Del Giudice; Ada Minutello; Susan Bonnington; Jan Holmgren; Kingston H G Mills; Karl G Nicholson
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Protection against divergent influenza H1N1 virus by a centralized influenza hemagglutinin.

Authors:  Eric A Weaver; Adam M Rubrum; Richard J Webby; Michael A Barry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evolution of H5N1 avian influenza viruses in Asia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.883

5.  Low seroprevalent species D adenovirus vectors as influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Eric A Weaver; Michael A Barry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Pre-existing immunity with high neutralizing activity to 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus in Shanghai population.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Liu; Yuan Liu; Yanjun Zhang; Zhihui Chen; Ziwei Tang; Qingqiang Xu; Yue Wang; Ping Zhao; Zhongtian Qi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.