Literature DB >> 10547549

Long term follow-up of women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery: the effect of age.

K J Van Zee1, L Liberman, B Samli, K N Tran, B McCormick, J A Petrek, P P Rosen, P I Borgen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although in recent years there has been a dramatic increase in both the incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and breast-conserving therapy for patients who have this disease, the optimal treatment for these patients remains controversial. Most data regarding outcomes have come from small, retrospective studies, with little data published from prospective, randomized studies. This study investigates the effects of age, postoperative breast irradiation, and other factors on local relapse free survival after breast-conserving surgery for women with DCIS in a large, single-institution series.
METHODS: A review was performed of all patients with DCIS who underwent breast-conserving surgery at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from 1978 through 1990. Of the 171 cases identified, data on follow-up and radiation therapy were available for 157. All available pathology slides (132 of 157) were rereviewed to determine histologic subtype, nuclear grade, presence of necrosis, and microscopic tumor size. Sixty-five patients (41%) received postoperative radiation therapy; selection criteria evolved over the time period. The median follow-up was 74 months.
RESULTS: Factors that were significantly (P< or =0.05) associated with a lower recurrence rate were older age, noncomedo subtype, lower nuclear grade, negative margins, and postoperative radiation therapy. The 6-year actuarial recurrence rate was 9.6% for patients who received postoperative radiation therapy and 20.7% for patients who had excision only (P = 0.05). Comparison of patients of ages > or =70, 40-69, and <40 years revealed a significantly lower risk of recurrence with increasing age. Actuarial 6-year local relapse rates were 10.8%, 14.0%, and 47.2%, respectively (P = 0.047). A benefit from radiation therapy was suggested for each age group. There was no statistically significant correlation between age group and any histologic factor examined. In multivariate analysis, only margin status was statistically significant (P = 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In addition to margin status, pathologic factors, and the use of radiation therapy, age is another factor that should be considered in assessing the risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery for patients with DCIS. Copyright 1999 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10547549     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19991101)86:9<1757::aid-cncr18>3.0.co;2-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  24 in total

Review 1.  Local and systemic outcomes in DCIS based on tumor and patient characteristics: the radiation oncologist's perspective.

Authors:  Nina Bijker; Geertjan van Tienhoven
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

2.  Young age is not associated with increased local recurrence for DCIS treated by breast-conserving surgery and radiation.

Authors:  Aruna Turaka; Gary M Freedman; Tianyu Li; Penny R Anderson; Ramona Swaby; Nicos Nicolaou; Lori Goldstein; Elin R Sigurdson; Richard J Bleicher
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Breast cancer guidelines for Uganda (2nd Edition 2008).

Authors:  A Gakwaya; M Galukande; A Luwaga; J Jombwe; J Fualal; E Kiguli-Malwadde; P Baguma; A Kanyike; J B Kigula-Mugamba
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.927

4.  Risk of Contralateral Breast Cancer in Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Associated with Synchronous Ipsilateral Lobular Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Megan E Miller; Shirin Muhsen; Emily C Zabor; Jessica Flynn; Cristina Olcese; Dilip Giri; Kimberly J Van Zee; Melissa Pilewskie
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Blurry boundaries: do epithelial borderline lesions of the breast and ductal carcinoma in situ have similar rates of subsequent invasive cancer?

Authors:  Daniel X Choi; Anne A Eaton; Cristina Olcese; Sujata Patil; Monica Morrow; Kimberly J Van Zee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Biology, treatment, and outcome in very young and older women with DCIS.

Authors:  Rosalinda Alvarado; Sara A Lari; Robert E Roses; Benjamin D Smith; Wei Yang; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Banu K Arun; Anthony Lucci; Gildy V Babiera; Jamie L Wagner; Abigail S Caudle; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Rosa F Hwang; Isabelle Bedrosian; Kelly K Hunt; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Model of outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices.

Authors:  Alexandra Barratt; Kirsten Howard; Les Irwig; Glenn Salkeld; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-08

8.  Relationship between clinical and pathologic features of ductal carcinoma in situ and patient age: an analysis of 657 patients.

Authors:  Laura C Collins; Ninah Achacoso; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Suzanne W Fletcher; Reina Haque; Charles P Quesenberry; Balaram Puligandla; Najeeb S Alshak; Lynn C Goldstein; Allen M Gown; Stuart J Schnitt; Laurel A Habel
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  Impact of Age on Risk of Recurrence of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Outcomes of 2996 Women Treated with Breast-Conserving Surgery Over 30 Years.

Authors:  Patricia A Cronin; Cristina Olcese; Sujata Patil; Monica Morrow; Kimberly J Van Zee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 10.  Does iron have a role in breast cancer?

Authors:  Xi Huang
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 41.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.