Literature DB >> 10547007

Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Long-term results after undercutting decompression compared with decompressive laminectomy alone or with instrumented fusion.

J D Rompe1, P Eysel, J Zöllner, B Nafe, J Heine.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of various surgical procedures for lumbar spinal stenosis. Operations were performed on 117 consecutive patients for lumbar spinal stenosis between 1987 and 1992. Pre- and intraoperative data were recorded in a standardized manner. Three treatment groups were distinguished: group I consisting of 39 patients submitted to undercutting decompression; group II, 51 patients, submitted to laminectomy and foraminal decompression alone; and group III, 27 patients, who underwent foraminal decompression and laminectomy with instrumented fusion. Eight years (5-10 years) after surgery a questionnaire was mailed to the patients containing the outcome scales according to Greenough and Fraser [6] and Turner et al. [22] together with questions about residual pain, necessity of treatment and satisfaction with the operative outcome. A total of 72 questionnaires (61.6%) gave enough information for analysis. After a mean follow-up of 8 years, walking capacity had increased significantly in all groups (P < 0.001). Compared to preoperative values, pain had decreased significantly in all groups (P < 0.01). In group I 36% had good-to-excellent outcomes, and 30.8% and 23.8% in groups II and III (P > 0.05). Forty percent of group I patients were unsatisfied with the result, compared to 38.4% and 33.3% in the other groups (P > 0.05). Overall, 25 of 72 patients (34.7%) had severe constant back and/or leg pain requiring daily administration of analgesics. We conclude that the long-term outcome of decompressive surgery of the lumbar spinal canal, without and with instrumented fusion, is less favourable than was previously reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10547007     DOI: 10.1007/s101430050040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  15 in total

Review 1.  Effect of fusion following decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Lin Liang; Wei-Min Jiang; Xue-Feng Li; Heng Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

2.  Laminarthrectomy as a surgical approach for decompressing the spinal canal: assessment of preoperative versus postoperative dural sac cross-sectional areal (DSCSA).

Authors:  Erland Hermansen; Gunnar Moen; Johan Barstad; Rune Birketvedt; Kari Indrekvam
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Patient outcomes after laminotomy, hemilaminectomy, laminectomy and laminectomy with instrumented fusion for spinal canal stenosis: a propensity score-based study from the Spine Tango registry.

Authors:  Everard Munting; Christoph Röder; Rolf Sobottke; Daniel Dietrich; Emin Aghayev
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The outcome of decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Sarfraz Ahmad; Abdulkader Hamad; Amit Bhalla; Sarah Turner; Birender Balain; David Jaffray
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.

Authors:  Gijsbert Overdevest; Carmen Vleggeert-Lankamp; Wilco Jacobs; Claudius Thomé; Robert Gunzburg; Wilco Peul
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Lumbar instrumented posterolateral fusion in spondylolisthetic and failed back patients: a long-term follow-up study spanning 11-13 years.

Authors:  Veli Turunen; Timo Nyyssönen; Hannu Miettinen; Olavi Airaksinen; Timo Aalto; Juhana Hakumäki; Heikki Kröger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.

Authors:  Jwo-Luen Pao; Shang-Ming Lin; Wen-Chi Chen; Chih-Hung Chang
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06

8.  The effect of dynamic, semi-rigid implants on the range of motion of lumbar motion segments after decompression.

Authors:  Tobias L Schulte; Christof Hurschler; Marcel Haversath; Ulf Liljenqvist; Viola Bullmann; Timm J Filler; Nani Osada; Eva-Maria Fallenberg; Lars Hackenberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  A less invasive surgical approach in the lumbar lateral recess stenosis: direct approach to the medial wall of the pedicle.

Authors:  Ahmet Colak; Kivanç Topuz; Murat Kutlay; Serdar Kaya; Hakan Simşek; Ahmet Cetinkal; Mehmet N Demircan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Variation in outcomes across centers after surgery for lumbar stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis in the spine patient outcomes research trial.

Authors:  Atman Desai; Kimon Bekelis; Perry A Ball; Jon Lurie; Sohail K Mirza; Tor D Tosteson; Wenyan Zhao; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.