Literature DB >> 10546622

Repair of full thickness rotator cuff tears. Gender, age, and other factors affecting outcome.

A A Romeo1, D W Hang, B R Bach, S Shott.   

Abstract

Seventy-two full thickness rotator cuff tears (72 patients) were treated with an open rotator cuff repair between 1986 and 1993. The average postoperative followup was 54 months (range, 24-102 months; standard deviation, 22 months). Fifty-three (74%) patients had no pain, 16 (22%) patients had slight pain without restriction of activities, and three (4%) patients had moderate pain with activity compromise. Women with an associated biceps tendon rupture tended to have worse results. Women had a negative, statistically significant relationship between age and shoulder scoring scales, but age at the time of surgery was not related to any outcome variables for men. A rotator cuff tear greater than or equal to 5 cm2 as determined at the time of surgery was associated with a poorer outcome. The average University of California at Los Angeles score was 32 points (range, 7-35 points; standard deviation, 5 points). The average Constant-Murley score was 78 of 100 points (range, 12-95 points; standard deviation, 15 points). A yes response was given for an average of 10 of 12 questions on the Simple Shoulder Test (range, 0-12 questions; standard deviation, 3 questions). More than 4 years after open rotator cuff repair, patients had a 94% patient satisfaction rate with lasting relief of pain and improved function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10546622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  44 in total

1.  Assessment of the canine model of rotator cuff injury and repair.

Authors:  Kathleen A Derwin; Andrew R Baker; Michael J Codsi; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Long-term clinical and MRI results of open repair of the supraspinatus tendon.

Authors:  Christophe Nich; Céline Mütschler; Eric Vandenbussche; Bernard Augereau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Indications for surgery in clinical outcome studies of rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Robert G Marx; Panagiotis Koulouvaris; Samuel K Chu; Bruce A Levy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Prognostic factors influencing the outcome of rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Gianpiero Cazzato; Fabrizio Donati; Pietro Randelli; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Does open repair of anterosuperior rotator cuff tear prevent muscular atrophy and fatty infiltration?

Authors:  Marion Di Schino; Bernard Augereau; Christophe Nich
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Limitations of isokinetic testing to determine shoulder strength after rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  David Yen
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2005

7.  Deltoid muscle tropism does not influence the outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  U G Longo; S Petrillo; G Rizzello; V Candela; V Denaro
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-06-14

8.  Contrast-enhanced MRI of the subdeltoid, subacromial bursa in painful and painless rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  R J Hodgson; P J O'Connor; E M A Hensor; D Barron; P Robinson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Do outcomes differ after rotator cuff repair for patients receiving workers' compensation?

Authors:  R Balyk; C Luciak-Corea; D Otto; D Baysal; L Beaupre
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Cross-sectional analysis of baseline differences of candidates for rotator cuff surgery: a sex and gender perspective.

Authors:  Helen Razmjou; Aileen M Davis; Susan B Jaglal; Richard Holtby; Robin R Richards
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.