Literature DB >> 10546413

Factors influencing the decision about orthodontic treatment. A longitudinal study among 11- and 15-year-olds and their parents.

K Birkeland1, A Katle, S Løvgreen, O E Bøe, P J Wisth.   

Abstract

The aims of the study were to evaluate the attitude towards orthodontic treatment among 11-(T1) and 15-year-old children (T2) and their parents, to present the distribution of referral rate and treatment uptake by a treatment need index assessed at T1 and to elucidate factors influencing the decision about orthodontic treatment in the period from T1 to T2. A group of 359 children and their parents answered separate questionnaires at T1, and 293 families responded to a follow-up study 4 years later. For the clinical examination, 224 children participated after exclusion of children in active treatment. The dental study casts were assessed by the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). The mean referral rate was 56%, with a variation from 40% to 71% among different dental clinics. About 44% of the children had completed or were undergoing orthodontic treatment at T2. No significant sex differences among referred and treated children were discovered. Aesthetic motives were the most frequently reported subjective reason for orthodontic care. The untreated group expressed diminishing treatment desire in the follow-up period. The logistic regression analysis selected Dental Health Component (DHC) grades as a strong predictor for treatment uptake, followed by parents' concern and attitude to braces, while the 11-year-olds' own orthodontic concern was less significant. Children in the untreated group with late treatment decisions (T2) were best predicted by Aesthetic Component (AC) changes from T1 to T2. The results indicate that dentists play a key role in determining orthodontic treatment levels. High referral rates secured low risk of denying care to some patients. Treatment decision may be guided by the orthodontist. However, individual variation in attitude and desire influence treatment uptake even among children with great need.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10546413     DOI: 10.1007/bf01301243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  23 in total

1.  Orthodontic care provided by general practitioners and specialists in three Swedish counties with different orthodontic specialist resources.

Authors:  K Bergström; A Halling
Journal:  Swed Dent J       Date:  1996

2.  Orthodontic treatment need in 10-year-old Dunedin schoolchildren.

Authors:  P Crowther; M Harkness; P Herbison
Journal:  N Z Dent J       Date:  1997-09

3.  [The need for orthodontic treatment in Ahus and Simrishamn].

Authors:  G Lindgren
Journal:  Tandlakartidningen       Date:  1986-05

4.  Factors influencing the uptake of orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  K O'Brien; J L McComb; N Fox; J Wright
Journal:  Br J Orthod       Date:  1996-11

5.  A longitudinal study on subjective and objective orthodontic treatment need.

Authors:  A Stenvik; L Espeland; A Mathisen
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Orthodontic treatment and socioeconomic status in Danish children aged 11-15 years.

Authors:  S Rölling
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.383

7.  Professional ethics and esthetic dentistry.

Authors:  D A Nash
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.634

8.  Orthodontic care from the patients' perspective: perceptions of 27-year-olds.

Authors:  K Bergström; A Halling; B Wilde
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Orthodontic treatment demand and need in third and fourth grade schoolchildren.

Authors:  T T Wheeler; S P McGorray; L Yurkiewicz; S D Keeling; G J King
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  An investigation into some of the factors influencing the desire for orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  M B Gosney
Journal:  Br J Orthod       Date:  1986-04
View more
  10 in total

1.  Parental influence is the most important predictor of child's orthodontic treatment demand in a preadolescent age.

Authors:  Martina Brumini; Martina Slaj; Visnja Katic; Andrej Pavlic; Magda Trinajstic Zrinski; Stjepan Spalj
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Perception and attitude of Mongolians on malocclusion.

Authors:  Gannaran Narangerel; Johnson Hsin-Chung Cheng; Ganjargal Ganburged; Bolormaa Sainbayar; Tracy Yi-Hsuan Lee
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.719

3.  Psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics in adolescence: validity and reliability of a questionnaire across age-groups.

Authors:  Ulrich Klages; Christina Erbe; Sandra Dinca Sandru; Dan Brüllman; Heinrich Wehrbein
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Influence of lower facial height changes on frontal facial attractiveness and perception of treatment need by lay people.

Authors:  Selin Kale Varlik; Evren Demirbaş; Metin Orhan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Orthodontic treatment need for adolescents in the Campania region: the malocclusion impact on self-concept.

Authors:  Letizia Perillo; Maria Esposito; Alberto Caprioglio; Stefania Attanasio; Annamaria Chiara Santini; Marco Carotenuto
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.711

6.  Cost analysis of two types of fixed maxillary retainers and a removable vacuum-formed maxillary retainer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mikael Sonesson; Sasan Naraghi; Lars Bondemark
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  SEM Evaluation of Enamel Surface Changes and Enamel Microhardness around Orthodontic Brackets after Application of CO2 Laser, Er,Cr:YSGG Laser and Fluoride Varnish: An In vivo Study.

Authors:  Tarundeep Kaur; Tulika Tripathi; Priyank Rai; Anup Kanase
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-09-01

8.  Effect of socioeconomic status on normative and perceived orthodontic treatment need.

Authors:  Serene A Badran; Alaa H Sabrah; Sofia A Hadidi; Susan Al-Khateeb
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  An Analysis of Correlation between Demand and Need for Orthodontic Treatment among Patients in Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University Dental College Clinic, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  George Sam; Saad Seehan; Meshari Al-Shayea
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015

10.  The Facial Aesthetic index: An additional tool for assessing treatment need.

Authors:  Shobha Sundareswaran; Ranjith Ramakrishnan
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.