Literature DB >> 10546008

Immediate feedback of HbA1c levels improves glycemic control in type 1 and insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients.

E Cagliero1, E V Levina, D M Nathan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Accurate and reliable HbA1c results can be obtained at the time of the office visit by using benchtop analyzers. We tested the hypothesis that immediately available HbA1c results could improve glycemic control by changing physician or patient behavior or both. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 201 type 1 and insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients attending an academic diabetes center. HbA1c levels, changes in insulin therapy, and use of health care resources were assessed during a 12-month follow-up period.
RESULTS: HbA1c levels decreased significantly at 6 and 12 months in the immediate assay group (-0.57 +/- 1.44 and -0.40 +/- 1.65%, respectively; P < 0.01) but did not change in the control group (-0.11 +/- 0.79 and -0.19 +/- 1.16%, respectively; NS). The changes were similar for both type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients. There were no differences in the rates of hypoglycemic events or use of health care resources.
CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of a controlled randomized trial, the immediate feedback of HbA1c results at the time of patient encounters resulted in a significant improvement of glycemic control at 6-month follow-up and persisted for the 12-month study. The introduction of this assay was positively received by both patients and physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10546008     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.22.11.1785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  61 in total

Review 1.  The National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program: Over 20 Years of Improving Hemoglobin A1c Measurement.

Authors:  Randie R Little; Curt Rohlfing; David B Sacks
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 2.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2012.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Analysis of the accuracy and precision of the Axis-Shield Afinion hemoglobin A1c measurement device.

Authors:  Randie R Little
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

4.  Evaluation of an over-the-counter glycated hemoglobin (A1C) test kit.

Authors:  Anna Chang; Joy Frank; Jennifer Knaebel; Jeanellen Fullam; Scott Pardo; David A Simmons
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01

5.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2011.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Onset features and subsequent clinical evolution of childhood diabetes over several years.

Authors:  Rebecca B Lipton; Melinda L Drum; Kirstie K Danielson; Siri Aw Greeley; Graeme I Bell; William A Hagopian
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 4.866

7.  Relative inaccuracy of the A1cNow in children with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Larry Fox; Mariya Dontchev; Katrina Ruedy; Roy Beck; Craig Kollman; Laurel Messer; Julie Coffey; Darrell Wilson; Elizabeth Doyle; William Tamborlane; Michael Steffes
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2009.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 9.  The Evidence to Support Point-of-Care Testing.

Authors:  Andrew St John
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2010-08

10.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.