Literature DB >> 10543853

Maintaining treatment boundaries in small communities and rural areas.

R I Simon1, I C Williams.   

Abstract

Psychiatrists and other mental health professionals practicing in small communities and rural areas encounter unique situations and customs that may complicate the task of maintaining treatment boundaries. Boundary adjustments are frequently required that do not disturb the psychiatrist-patient relationship. The authors discuss specific boundary problems that arise in maintaining the psychiatrist's neutrality; fostering the psychological separateness of the patient; protecting confidentiality; ensuring that the psychiatrist has no previous, current, or future personal relationship with the patient; preserving anonymity of the psychiatrist; and establishing a stable fee policy. Four vignettes illustrate boundary issues that may be encountered in psychiatric practice in small communities. The authors suggest that applying the rule of abstinence, which states that the therapist must abstain from obtaining personal gratification at the expense of the patient, can help therapists distinguish between boundary issues, crossings, and violations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mental Health Therapies; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10543853     DOI: 10.1176/ps.50.11.1440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Serv        ISSN: 1075-2730            Impact factor:   3.084


  4 in total

1.  A Case of a Patient/Physician Boundary Issue in Rural Practice and Measures to Avoid or Maintain Dual Relationships.

Authors:  Pravesh Sharma
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2015-04-23

2.  A proposed rural healthcare ethics agenda.

Authors:  W Nelson; A Pomerantz; K Howard; A Bushy
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Be known, be available, be mutual: a qualitative ethical analysis of social values in rural palliative care.

Authors:  Barbara Pesut; Joan L Bottorff; Carole A Robinson
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Frequency of satisfaction and dissatisfaction with practice among rural-based, group-employed physicians and non-physician practitioners.

Authors:  Anthony C Waddimba; Melissa Scribani; Nicole Krupa; John J May; Paul Jenkins
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.