Literature DB >> 10543612

Role of endogenous endonucleases and tissue site in transfection and CpG-mediated immune activation after naked DNA injection.

M E Barry1, D Pinto-González, F M Orson, G J McKenzie, G R Petry, M A Barry.   

Abstract

DNA degradation is a fundamental problem for any gene therapy or genetic immunization approach, since destruction of incoming genes translates into loss of gene expression. To characterize the biology of DNA degradation after naked DNA injection, the location and levels of tissue nucleases were assessed. Extracts from the serum, kidney, and liver of mice had high levels of calcium-dependent endonuclease activity. High levels of acidic endonuclease activity were identified in the spleen, liver, kidney, and skin with little activity in skeletal or cardiac muscle. Relatively little exonuclease activity was observed in any tissue. The presence of endonucleases in the skin and muscle mediated degradation of 99% of naked DNA within 90 min of injection. This degradation most likely occurred in the extracellular space upstream of other cellular events. Despite this massive destruction, gross tissue nuclease levels did not determine skin-to-muscle transfection efficiency, or site-to-site transfection efficiency in the skin. While gross tissue nuclease levels do not appear to determine differences in transfection efficiency, the presence of robust tissue nuclease activity still necessitates that massive amounts of DNA be used to overcome the loss of 99% of expressible DNA. In addition to destroying genes, the nucleases may play a second role in genetic immunization by converting large plasmids into small oligonucleotides that can be taken up more easily by immune cells to stimulate CpG-dependent Th1 immune responses. For genetic immunization, vaccine outcome may depend on striking the right balance of nuclease effects to allow survival of sufficient DNA to express the antigen, while concomitantly generating sufficient amounts of immunostimulatory DNA fragments to drive Th1 booster effects. For gene therapy, all nuclease effects would appear to be negative, since these enzymes destroy gene expression while also stimulating cellular immune responses against transgene-modified host cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10543612     DOI: 10.1089/10430349950016816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Gene Ther        ISSN: 1043-0342            Impact factor:   5.695


  32 in total

1.  Intramuscular delivery of DNA releasing microspheres: microsphere properties and transgene expression.

Authors:  Jae-Hyung Jang; Lonnie D Shea
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 9.776

2.  Transcription factor plasmid binding modulates microtubule interactions and intracellular trafficking during gene transfer.

Authors:  M A Badding; E E Vaughan; D A Dean
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 5.250

3.  Pharmacokinetics and risk evaluation of DNA vaccine against Schistosoma japonicum.

Authors:  Hai-Feng Liu; Wei Li; Ming-Bo Lu; Long-Jiang Yu
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.289

4.  Electroporation-mediated gene delivery.

Authors:  Jennifer L Young; David A Dean
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 1.944

5.  Brain-specific expression of an exogenous gene after i.v. administration.

Authors:  N Shi; Y Zhang; C Zhu; R J Boado; W M Pardridge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Magnetically driven plasmid DNA delivery with biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles.

Authors:  Michael Chorny; Boris Polyak; Ivan S Alferiev; Kenneth Walsh; Gary Friedman; Robert J Levy
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Water-soluble and low molecular weight chitosan-based plasmid DNA delivery.

Authors:  M Lee; J W Nah; Y Kwon; J J Koh; K S Ko; S W Kim
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  APOBEC3A catabolism of electroporated plasmid DNA in mouse muscle.

Authors:  A Kostrzak; M Henry; P L Demoyen; S Wain-Hobson; J-P Vartanian
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 5.250

9.  Use of DAF-displaying adenovirus vectors reduces induction of transgene- and vector-specific adaptive immune responses in mice.

Authors:  Sergey S Seregin; Yasser A Aldhamen; Daniel M Appledorn; Jennifer Zehnder; Tyler Voss; Sarah Godbehere; Andrea Amalfitano
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 5.695

10.  Cellular gene transfer mediated by influenza virosomes with encapsulated plasmid DNA.

Authors:  Jørgen de Jonge; Johanna M Leenhouts; Marijke Holtrop; Pieter Schoen; Peter Scherrer; Pieter R Cullis; Jan Wilschut; Anke Huckriede
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 3.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.