Literature DB >> 10543472

Prospective comparison of radiologic, thoracoscopic, and pathologic staging in patients with early non-small cell lung cancer.

J R Roberts1, M G Blum, R Arildsen, D C Drinkwater, K R Christian, T A Powers, W H Merrill.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: More accurate staging at the time of initial presentation could improve design of clinical trials and avoid inappropriate surgical decisions in individual patients. Preresection staging of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not straightforward, especially in patients with negative mediastinal nodes. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of radiologic, thoracoscopic, and pathologic staging in patients with NSCLC and negative mediastinoscopy.
METHODS: All patients with NSCLC underwent computed tomographic (CT) scanning before surgical staging with mediastinoscopy. Patients with negative mediastinoscopy then underwent thoracoscopic staging with examination of pleural surfaces, and identification of T (visceral and parietal pleural invasion, sampling of pleural fluid, and pleural lavage) and N (intraparenchymal and inferior mediastinal nodal sampling, if possible) stage descriptors before resection.
RESULTS: Thoracoscopy was more accurate than CT scanning in the staging of 50 patients with early lung cancer (stages IA, IB, IIA, and IIB), especially as regards T stage. Further, thoracoscopic examination ruled out malignant pleural effusions in 7 (14%) patients with radiologically obvious effusions, and identified radiologically silent malignant pleural effusions in 3 (6%) patients. Chest wall invasion was accurately identified at thoracoscopy in most patients. Finally, 3 patients with T1 lower lobe lesions and negative mediastinoscopy were found to have involvement of inferior mediastinal nodes (level 8 or 9) at thoracoscopy. However, thoracoscopy did not allow sampling of aortopulmonary window nodes in some patients with bulky left upper lobe lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: Errors in thoracoscopic staging resulted in no inappropriate operations. However, errors in CT staging would have resulted in operations unlikely to help the patients, or would have inappropriately excluded patients from surgery. Thoracoscopic staging was more accurate than CT staging in this cohort of patients with NSCLC and negative mediastinoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10543472     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00983-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

1.  Side-by-side reading of PET and CT scans in oncology: which patients might profit from integrated PET/CT?

Authors:  Patrick Reinartz; Franz-Josef Wieres; Wolfram Schneider; Alexander Schur; Ulrich Buell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and liquid-based thin-layer cytology.

Authors:  W A H Wallace; H M Monaghan; D M Salter; M A Gibbons; K M Skwarski
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Thoracoscopic fluorescence diagnosis (TFD) of pleural malignancies: experimental studies.

Authors:  R L Prosst; S Winkler; E Boehm; J Gahlen
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  A new method in thoracoscopic inferior mediastinal lymph node biopsy: a case report.

Authors:  Maruf Sanlı; Ahmet F Isik; Bulent Tuncozgur; Levent Elbeyli
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2009-11-03

5.  The role of VATS in the staging of non small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Reza Bagheri; Alireza Tavassoli; Seyed Ziaollah Haghi; Mehdi Abasi Sahebi; Noora Bigdeli
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2013-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.