Literature DB >> 10541759

Limited clinical utility of a self-evaluating risk assessment scale for postmenopausal osteoporosis: lack of predictive value of lifestyle-related factors.

S Goemaere1, B Zegels, K Toye, S Cremer, R Demuynck, M Daems, K Dobbelaere, W B Sedrine, A Albert, W Dewe, J M Kaufman, J Y Reginster.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency of a self-administered questionnaire to identify subjects with postmenopausal osteoporosis in the setting of first line medical care. A sample of 300 postmenopausal women completed the questionnaire based on 18 items. Bone mineral density at the lumbar spine (BMD-L), total hip (BMD-H), and femoral neck (BMD-N) was used as objective criterion for evaluation. The mean risk score was 8.2 +/- 3.21. BMD was correlated with total risk score: r = -0.32 for BMD-L, -0.36 for BMD-N, and -0.43 for BMD-H. Cutoff points for the risk score (equal likelihood points) according to a T-score threshold of -2.5 were 8.6 for BMD-L and BMD-N and 9.3 for BMD-H; specificity and sensitivity was 62% and 62%, respectively, for BMD-L, 65% and 62% for BMD-N, and 75% and 63% for BMD-H. Stepwise multiple regression analysis of the questionnaire items in relation to BMD showed higher correlation coefficients for models including individual items rather than the overall risk score. Items concerning low weight, older age, and wrist fracture after 50 years of age were always selected as significant determinants of BMD (R = 0.43-0.55). Hormonal replacement therapy was also an important determinant. Lifestyle-related items did not contribute significantly. In conclusion, the diagnostic performance of the 18-item self-administered questionnaire was poorer than a shortened questionnaire omitting lifestyle factors. The clinical utility of a questionnaire should ultimately be evaluated in the specific optic of a chosen global strategy for prevention of osteoporotic fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10541759     DOI: 10.1007/s002239900712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  4 in total

1.  An audit of bone densitometry practice with reference to ISCD, IOF and NOF guidelines.

Authors:  R Baddoura; H Awada; J Okais; M Salamoun; G Ayoub; N Ziadé; G El Hajj-Fuleihan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  A risk assessment tool (OsteoRisk) for identifying Latin American women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Shuvayu S Sen; Vincent P Rives; Osvaldo D Messina; Jorge Morales-Torres; Gregorio Riera; Juan M Angulo-Solimano; João F M Neto; Alberto Frisoli; Ricardo C Sáenz; Olga Geling; Philip D Ross
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Comparison of questionnaire and quantitative ultrasound techniques as screening tools for DXA.

Authors:  R B Cook; D Collins; J Tucker; P Zioupos
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Which screening strategy using BMD measurements would be most cost effective for hip fracture prevention in elderly women? A decision analysis based on a Markov model.

Authors:  A M Schott; C Ganne; D Hans; G Monnier; R Gauchoux; M A Krieg; P D Delmas; P J Meunier; C Colin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 4.507

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.