Literature DB >> 10541339

Can current models explain the lack of liver complications in Y-90 microsphere therapy?

E D Yorke1, A Jackson, R A Fox, B W Wessels, B N Gray.   

Abstract

Normal liver complications have not been observed in Y-90 microsphere therapy of hepatic tumors [selective internal radiation (SIR)], despite clinical studies reporting estimated absorbed doses to normal liver between 100 and 150 Gy. The purpose of the study was to see whether predictions of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models for liver based on clinical data from external beam therapy are consistent with clinical results of SIR. Liver NTCP was calculated using a parallel architecture model and normal liver dose-volume histograms that have been proposed for SIR. A parallel model including internal functional subunit structure is also proposed. Dose rate effects are incorporated. A criterion for comparing model calculations with clinical data is presented. For the parallel architecture model, the predicted NTCP is sensitive to the dose distribution in normal liver and to the model parameters, particularly the repair time. With reasonable assumptions about the microsphere distribution, the parallel model with parameters deduced from external beam therapy outcome analysis is consistent with the observed lack of liver complications. Inclusion of FSU structure widens the range of assumptions under which consistency is found. The parallel model can be consistent with the clinically observed lack of liver complications in SIR. More information about the activity distribution and the radiobiology of normal liver under conditions typical of microsphere therapy should be sought.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10541339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  10 in total

1.  EANM procedure guideline for the treatment of liver cancer and liver metastases with intra-arterial radioactive compounds.

Authors:  Francesco Giammarile; Lisa Bodei; Carlo Chiesa; Glenn Flux; Flavio Forrer; Françoise Kraeber-Bodere; Boudewijn Brans; Bieke Lambert; Mark Konijnenberg; Françoise Borson-Chazot; Jan Tennvall; Markus Luster
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Radioembolization of hepatic tumors.

Authors:  Andrew Kennedy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-06

Review 3.  Transcatheter intraarterial therapies: rationale and overview.

Authors:  Robert J Lewandowski; Jean-Francois Geschwind; Eleni Liapi; Riad Salem
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Radioembolization for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Road to Personalized Dosimetry and Ablative Practice.

Authors:  Cynthia De la Garza-Ramos; Beau B Toskich
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 1.780

Review 5.  Radioembolization for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a clinical review.

Authors:  Saad-M Ibrahim; Robert-J Lewandowski; Kent-T Sato; Vanessa-L Gates; Laura Kulik; Mary-F Mulcahy; Robert-K Ryu; Reed-A Omary; Riad Salem
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Transarterial therapy: an evolving treatment modality of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Khalid A Jazieh; Mohammad Arabi; Azzam A Khankan
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.485

7.  Treating hepatocellular carcinoma with 90Y-bearing microspheres: a review.

Authors:  Te-Chun Hsieh; Yu-Chin Wu; Shung-Shung Sun; Kuo-Yang Yen; Chia-Hung Kao
Journal:  Biomedicine (Taipei)       Date:  2016-11-16

8.  Comparison of dose response models for predicting normal tissue complications from cancer radiotherapy: application in rat spinal cord.

Authors:  Magdalena Adamus-Górka; Panayiotis Mavroidis; Bengt K Lind; Anders Brahme
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 9.  Radioembolization of hepatic lesions from a radiobiology and dosimetric perspective.

Authors:  Marta Cremonesi; Carlo Chiesa; Lidia Strigari; Mahila Ferrari; Francesca Botta; Francesco Guerriero; Concetta De Cicco; Guido Bonomo; Franco Orsi; Lisa Bodei; Amalia Di Dia; Chiara Maria Grana; Roberto Orecchia
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  The physics of radioembolization.

Authors:  Remco Bastiaannet; S Cheenu Kappadath; Britt Kunnen; Arthur J A T Braat; Marnix G E H Lam; Hugo W A M de Jong
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2018-11-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.