Literature DB >> 10541114

Effect of patients' being prone during FDG PET for the diagnosis of breast cancer.

K Yutani1, M Tatsumi, T Uehara, T Nishimura.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1999        PMID： 10541114     DOI： 10.2214/ajr.173.5.10541114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN： 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  Association between serial dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and dynamic 18F-FDG PET measures in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Risa K Vanantwerp; Robert K Doot; Xiaoyu Chai; Brenda F Kurland; Peter R Eby; Jennifer M Specht; Lisa K Dunnwald; Erin K Schubert; Constance D Lehman; David A Mankoff
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Comparison of prone versus supine 18F-FDG-PET of locally advanced breast cancer: Phantom and preliminary clinical studies.

Authors:  Jason M Williams; Sudheer D Rani; Xia Li; Lori R Arlinghaus; Tzu-Cheng Lee; Lawrence R MacDonald; Savannah C Partridge; Hakmook Kang; Jennifer G Whisenant; Richard G Abramson; Hannah M Linden; Paul E Kinahan; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  PIK3CA Mutational Status Is Associated with High Glycolytic Activity in ER+/HER2- Early Invasive Breast Cancer: a Molecular Imaging Study Using [18F]FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Heinrich Magometschnigg; Katja Pinker; Thomas Helbich; Anita Brandstetter; Margaretha Rudas; Thomas Nakuz; Pascal Baltzer; Wolfgang Wadsak; Marcus Hacker; Michael Weber; Peter Dubsky; Martin Filipits
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT compared with that of contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast at 3 T.

Authors:  Heinrich F Magometschnigg; Pascal A Baltzer; Barbara Fueger; Thomas H Helbich; Georgios Karanikas; Peter Dubsky; Margaretha Rudas; Michael Weber; Katja Pinker
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Prone Versus Supine Breast FDG-PET/CT for Assessing Locoregional Disease Distribution in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Richard G Abramson; Katrina F Lambert; Laurie B Jones-Jackson; Lori R Arlinghaus; Jason Williams; Vandana G Abramson; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Correlation between PET/CT results and histological and immunohistochemical findings in breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Almir Galvão Vieira Bitencourt; Eduardo Nóbrega Pereira Lima; Rubens Chojniak; Elvira Ferreira Marques; Juliana Alves de Souza; Luciana Graziano; Wesley Pereira Andrade; Cynthia Aparecida Bueno de Toledo Osório
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr

7.  Improved visualization of breast tissue on a dedicated breast PET system through ergonomic redesign of the imaging table.

Authors:  Michael K O'Connor; Thuy D Tran; Tiffinee N Swanson; Lacey R Ellingson; Katie N Hunt; Dana H Whaley
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.138

8.  Quantitative Comparison of Prone and Supine PERCIST Measurements in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer G Whisenant; Jason M Williams; Hakmook Kang; Lori R Arlinghaus; Richard G Abramson; Vandana G Abramson; Kareem Fakhoury; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2020-06

9.  Investigation of Added Value of Imaging Performed in a Prone Position to Standard 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging for Staging in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ezgi Başak Erdoğan; Mehmet Aydın
Journal:  Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther       Date:  2022-02-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.