OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to analyze the hemodynamic properties and vascular supply changes in the carcinogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten nodules (nine patients) (one early, three early-advanced, and six advanced cases of hepatocellular carcinoma) less than 3 cm in diameter were selected from 45 patients (50 nodules) who underwent CT arteriography and CT during arterial portography. These images were correlated with histopathologic findings. Ratios of all microscopically counted (normal hepatic and abnormal) arteries, normal hepatic arteries, and portal veins in each nodule to those in the surrounding liver were calculated. RESULTS: Early hepatocellular carcinoma (one early case and early areas in three early-advanced cases) had low attenuation on CT arteriography and isoattenuation on CT during arterial portography. Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (six advanced cases and advanced areas in three early-advanced cases) had high attenuation on CT arteriography and low attenuation on CT during arterial portography. In early hepatocellular carcinoma, the ratios of all arteries, normal hepatic arteries, and portal veins were 1.21 +/- 0.07, 0.60 +/- 0.07, and 0.73 +/- 0.06, respectively. In advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, the ratios were 2.66 +/- 0.26, 0.08 +/- 0.04, and 0.07 +/- 0.03, respectively. CONCLUSION: In early hepatocellular carcinoma, the combination of normal hepatic artery degeneration and preserved portal veins results in low attenuation on CT arteriography and isoattenuation on CT during arterial portography. In advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, the combination of neoplastic (abnormal) arterial development by angiogenesis and obliteration of portal veins results in high attenuation on CT arteriography and low attenuation on CT during arterial portography. These findings are a characteristic difference between early and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to analyze the hemodynamic properties and vascular supply changes in the carcinogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten nodules (nine patients) (one early, three early-advanced, and six advanced cases of hepatocellular carcinoma) less than 3 cm in diameter were selected from 45 patients (50 nodules) who underwent CT arteriography and CT during arterial portography. These images were correlated with histopathologic findings. Ratios of all microscopically counted (normal hepatic and abnormal) arteries, normal hepatic arteries, and portal veins in each nodule to those in the surrounding liver were calculated. RESULTS: Early hepatocellular carcinoma (one early case and early areas in three early-advanced cases) had low attenuation on CT arteriography and isoattenuation on CT during arterial portography. Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (six advanced cases and advanced areas in three early-advanced cases) had high attenuation on CT arteriography and low attenuation on CT during arterial portography. In early hepatocellular carcinoma, the ratios of all arteries, normal hepatic arteries, and portal veins were 1.21 +/- 0.07, 0.60 +/- 0.07, and 0.73 +/- 0.06, respectively. In advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, the ratios were 2.66 +/- 0.26, 0.08 +/- 0.04, and 0.07 +/- 0.03, respectively. CONCLUSION: In early hepatocellular carcinoma, the combination of normal hepatic artery degeneration and preserved portal veins results in low attenuation on CT arteriography and isoattenuation on CT during arterial portography. In advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, the combination of neoplastic (abnormal) arterial development by angiogenesis and obliteration of portal veins results in high attenuation on CT arteriography and low attenuation on CT during arterial portography. These findings are a characteristic difference between early and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Authors: Melanie B Thomas; Deborah Jaffe; Michael M Choti; Jacques Belghiti; Steven Curley; Yuman Fong; Gregory Gores; Robert Kerlan; Phillipe Merle; Bert O'Neil; Ronnie Poon; Lawrence Schwartz; Joel Tepper; Francis Yao; Daniel Haller; Margaret Mooney; Alan Venook Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-08-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jens Walldorf; Andrea Tannapfel; Hans Jürgen Holzhausen; Christian Wittekind; Thomas Seufferlein; Utz Settmacher; Wolfgang E Fleig; Matthias M Dollinger Journal: BMJ Case Rep Date: 2009-11-29
Authors: Kazim H Narsinh; Mark Van Buskirk; Andrew S Kennedy; Mohammed Suhail; Naif Alsaikhan; Carl K Hoh; Kenneth Thurston; Jeet Minocha; David S Ball; Steven J Cohen; Michael Cohn; Douglas M Coldwell; Alain Drooz; Eduardo Ehrenwald; Samir Kanani; Charles W Nutting; Fred M Moeslein; Michael A Savin; Sabine Schirm; Samuel G Putnam; Navesh K Sharma; Eric A Wang; Steven C Rose Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-07-19 Impact factor: 11.105