Literature DB >> 10541076

Development of a fluorescent light technique for evaluating microdamage in bone subjected to fatigue loading.

S S Huja1, M S Hasan, R Pidaparti, C H Turner, L P Garetto, D B Burr.   

Abstract

A new method using fluorescent light microscopy has been developed to visualize and evaluate bone microdamage. We report the findings of two different experiments with a common aim of comparing the fluorescent light technique to the brightfield method for quantifying microdamage in bone. In Experiment 1, 36 canine femurs were tested in four-point cyclic bending until they had lost between 5 and 43% of their stiffness. The loaded portion of the bone was stained en bloc with basic fuchsin for the presence of damage. Standard point counting techniques were used to calculate fractional damaged area (Dm.Ar = Cr.Ar/B.Ar, mm2/mm2) under brightfield and fluorescent microscopy. In Experiment 2, bone microdamage adjacent to endosseous implants, subjected to fatigue loading (150,000 cycles, 2 Hz and 37 degrees C) ex vivo was examined. The bone around the implant was either allowed to heal (adapted specimen) for 12 weeks after placement in dog mid-femoral diaphyses prior to testing or was loaded immediately to simulate non-healed bone surrounding endosseous implants (non-adapted). Crack numerical density (Cr.Dn = Cr.N/B.Ar, #/mm2), crack surface density (Cr.S.Dn = Tt.Cr.Le/B.Ar, mm/mm2) and fractional damaged area were calculated separately by both techniques in the adapted and non-adapted specimens. In both Experiments 1 and 2, significantly more microdamage was detected by the fluorescent technique than by the brightfield method. Also, there was a trend towards higher intraobserver repeatability when using the fluorescent method. These results suggest that the brightfield technique underestimates microdamage accumulation and that the fluorescent technique better represents the actual amounts of microdamage present. The results demonstrate that the fluorescent method provides an accurate and precise approach for bone microdamage evaluation, and that it improves the prediction of stiffness loss from damage accumulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10541076     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00047-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  8 in total

1.  Importance of microcracks in etiology of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: a possible pathogenetic model of symptomatic and non-symptomatic osteonecrosis of the jaw based on scanning electron microscopy findings.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoefert; Inge Schmitz; Andrea Tannapfel; Harald Eufinger
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Age-related differences in the morphology of microdamage propagation in trabecular bone.

Authors:  Jessica O Green; Jason Wang; Tamim Diab; Brani Vidakovic; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Age-related changes in human trabecular bone: Relationship between microstructural stress and strain and damage morphology.

Authors:  Jessica O Green; Srinidhi Nagaraja; Tamim Diab; Brani Vidakovic; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  Bone microdamage: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  R D Chapurlat; P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  The real response of bone to exercise.

Authors:  Alan Boyde
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 6.  Detecting microdamage in bone.

Authors:  T C Lee; S Mohsin; D Taylor; R Parkesh; T Gunnlaugsson; F J O'Brien; M Giehl; W Gowin
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Lactate produced by glycogenolysis in astrocytes regulates memory processing.

Authors:  Lori A Newman; Donna L Korol; Paul E Gold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Non destructive characterization of cortical bone micro-damage by nonlinear resonant ultrasound spectroscopy.

Authors:  Sylvain Haupert; Sandra Guérard; Françoise Peyrin; David Mitton; Pascal Laugier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.