Literature DB >> 10539543

How can we help people make sense of medical data?

S Woloshin1, L M Schwartz.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Information is a basic prerequisite to informed medical decision making. GENERAL QUESTION: How can we help people interpret the quantitative data they need to make informed decisions? SPECIFIC RESEARCH CHALLENGE: To develop and evaluate interventions that will help people make sense of the quantitative data relevant to their health care decisions. STANDARD APPROACH: Traditional patient education interventions focus on providing disease-specific information (e.g., educational brochures about a single disease). POTENTIAL DIFFICULTIES: Interventions that focus on content--the provision of facts--may not be sufficient help for people facing medical decisions. Training that prepares people to make sense of the facts that they are given may be necessary. ALTERNATE APPROACH: We propose developing a generic (i.e., not disease-specific) tutorial to prepare people to better understand and more critically evaluate data on disease risk and the benefits and harms of treatment. This tutorial aims to improve critical reading skills by teaching people about risk (e.g., probability and rates) and showing them what to look for in statements about risk (e.g., time frame), how to put disease risk and treatment benefit in context (e.g., evaluating competing risks), how to interpret changes in risk, and whether to believe the statements about changes in risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10539543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eff Clin Pract        ISSN: 1099-8128


  15 in total

1.  Effect of various risk/benefit trade-offs on parents' understanding of a pediatric research study.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Angela Fagerlin; Terri Voepel-Lewis
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight.

Authors:  Gerd Gigerenzer; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-27

Review 3.  What are the chances? Evaluating risk and benefit information in consumer health materials.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Burkell
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2004-04

4.  The effect of format on parents' understanding of the risks and benefits of clinical research: a comparison between text, tables, and graphics.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2010-07

5.  Estimating and disclosing the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease: challenges, controversies and future directions.

Authors:  J Scott Roberts; Sarah M Tersegno
Journal:  Future Neurol       Date:  2010-07-01

Review 6.  Using Alzheimer's disease as a model for genetic risk disclosure: implications for personal genomics.

Authors:  J S Roberts; K D Christensen; R C Green
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  Amyloid imaging, risk disclosure and Alzheimer's disease: ethical and practical issues.

Authors:  J Scott Roberts; Laura B Dunn; Gil D Rabinovici
Journal:  Neurodegener Dis Manag       Date:  2013

8.  Breast cancer patients' treatment expectations after exposure to the decision aid program adjuvant online: the influence of numeracy.

Authors:  Isaac M Lipkus; Ellen Peters; Gretchen Kimmick; Vlayka Liotcheva; Paul Marcom
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  A randomized comparison of patients' understanding of number needed to treat and other common risk reduction formats.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Michael P Pignone; Carmen L Lewis
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  Genetic susceptibility testing for neurodegenerative diseases: ethical and practice issues.

Authors:  J Scott Roberts; Wendy R Uhlmann
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 11.685

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.