A P Halpert1, S D Pearson, T Reina. 1. Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates Division of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many patients are admitted to acute-care hospitals when their medical needs might be more appropriately met in an extended-care facility (ECF). OBJECTIVE: To describe a cohort of patients who were admitted from an emergency department to an ECF. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: 121 enrollees of Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates who were admitted directly from an emergency department to an ECF between October 1, 1994, and December 31, 1997. OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean length of stay, charges per patient, and discharge disposition (discharged to home, discharged to a long-term-care facility, died, or transferred to an acute-care hospital within 30 days of ECF admission). RESULTS: Patients admitted directly to an ECF were generally frail and elderly (median age, 75 years). Mean length of stay in the ECF was 11 days; the mean per-patient charge was $3290. Three quarters of patients were discharged from the ECF to their homes. Six percent (seven patients) were transferred from the ECF to an acute-care hospital within 30 days of ECF admission. None of these transfers clearly suggested that the initial decision to directly admit a patient to the ECF was inappropriate. Most patients were satisfied with direct ECF admission: Of the surviving, cognitively intact patients admitted to an ECF in 1997, 71% stated that they would choose direct admission to an ECF over admission to an acute-care hospital if they were "in a similar situation in the future." CONCLUSIONS: For selected patients, direct admission to an ECF seems to be feasible, safe, and acceptable. A randomized, clinical trial is needed to fully assess the safety and cost implications of direct ECF admission.
BACKGROUND: Many patients are admitted to acute-care hospitals when their medical needs might be more appropriately met in an extended-care facility (ECF). OBJECTIVE: To describe a cohort of patients who were admitted from an emergency department to an ECF. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: 121 enrollees of Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates who were admitted directly from an emergency department to an ECF between October 1, 1994, and December 31, 1997. OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean length of stay, charges per patient, and discharge disposition (discharged to home, discharged to a long-term-care facility, died, or transferred to an acute-care hospital within 30 days of ECF admission). RESULTS:Patients admitted directly to an ECF were generally frail and elderly (median age, 75 years). Mean length of stay in the ECF was 11 days; the mean per-patient charge was $3290. Three quarters of patients were discharged from the ECF to their homes. Six percent (seven patients) were transferred from the ECF to an acute-care hospital within 30 days of ECF admission. None of these transfers clearly suggested that the initial decision to directly admit a patient to the ECF was inappropriate. Most patients were satisfied with direct ECF admission: Of the surviving, cognitively intact patients admitted to an ECF in 1997, 71% stated that they would choose direct admission to an ECF over admission to an acute-care hospital if they were "in a similar situation in the future." CONCLUSIONS: For selected patients, direct admission to an ECF seems to be feasible, safe, and acceptable. A randomized, clinical trial is needed to fully assess the safety and cost implications of direct ECF admission.