Literature DB >> 10537440

A prospective cost-consequence analysis of adding lamivudine to zidovudine-containing antiretroviral treatment regimens for HIV infection in the US.

L Lacey1, J Mauskopf, R Lindrooth, S Pham, M Saag, W Sawyer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healthcare resource use data were collected for 1 year as part of the CAESAR (Canada, Australia, Europe, South Africa) clinical trial, which evaluated the effect of adding lamivudine to treatment regimens containing zidovudine in patients with HIV infection. This study showed that lamivudine-containing regimens reduced HIV disease progression to AIDS or death, in addition to significantly reducing the number of hospital stays, unscheduled outpatient visits, and medications for HIV-related illness. Estimates of US unit costs for each healthcare service were derived from nationally representative data sources, and were used to determine the costs of treatment during the trial period for the treatment and control groups.
RESULTS: A cost-consequence analysis showed that, in addition to the health benefits associated with the lamivudine regimen, costs for treating HIV-related illness and adverse events were lower with the lamivudine regimen. The average decrease in costs per patient for the 1-year period ranged from $US1922 to $US2645, depending on the data source used to estimate hospital length of stay. The incremental cost of lamivudine therapy for the 1-year period was $US2293. The estimated difference in total costs for the 2 treatment regimens thus ranged from an increase of $US371 to a cost saving of $US353.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that treatments which slow the progression of HIV infection have the potential to reduce the monthly costs associated with HIV-related illness and adverse events during the time period that progression is slowed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10537440     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199915001-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  18 in total

1.  Cost effectiveness of antiviral treatment with zalcitabine plus zidovudine for AIDS patients with CD4+ counts less than 300/microliters in 5 European countries.

Authors:  K Simpson; E J Hatziandreu; F Andersson; A Shakespeare; I Oleksy; A N Tosteson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  On the decision rules of cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  M Johannesson; M C Weinstein
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Design of the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST).

Authors:  H P Adams; R F Woolson; W R Clarke; P H Davis; B H Bendixen; B B Love; P A Wasek; K J Grimsman
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1997-08

4.  Modelling the cost effectiveness of lamivudine/zidovudine combination therapy in HIV infection.

Authors:  J V Chancellor; A M Hill; C A Sabin; K N Simpson; M Youle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Lamivudine reduces healthcare resource use when added to zidovudine-containing regimens in patients with HIV infection.

Authors:  L Lacey; M J Gill
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  The cost-effectiveness of treatment with lamivudine and zidovudine compared with zidovudine alone: a comparison of Markov model and trial data estimates.

Authors:  J Mauskopf; L Lacey; A Kempel; K Simpson
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Randomised trial of addition of lamivudine or lamivudine plus loviride to zidovudine-containing regimens for patients with HIV-1 infection: the CAESAR trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-05-17       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Modelling the potential economic impact of viral load-driven triple drug combination antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  A H Anis; R S Hogg; X H Wang; B Yip; A Palepu; J S Montaner; M V O'Shaughnessy; M T Schechter
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Costs to Medicaid of advancing immunosuppression in an urban HIV-infected patient population in Maryland.

Authors:  R D Moore; R E Chaisson
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol       Date:  1997-03-01

Review 10.  Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in 1998: updated recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA Panel.

Authors:  C C Carpenter; M A Fischl; S M Hammer; M S Hirsch; D M Jacobsen; D A Katzenstein; J S Montaner; D D Richman; M S Saag; R T Schooley; M A Thompson; S Vella; P G Yeni; P A Volberding
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Cost effectiveness of combination HIV therapy: 3 years later.

Authors:  R D Moore
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  AIDS policy modeling for the 21st century: an overview of key issues.

Authors:  M S Rauner; M L Brandeau
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2001-09

3.  Using simulation for AIDS policy modeling: benefits for HIV/AIDS prevention policy makers in Vienna, Austria.

Authors:  Marion S Rauner
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2002-04

4.  A prospective evaluation of the cost effectiveness of adding lamivudine to zidovudine-containing antiretroviral treatment regimens in HIV infection. European perspective.

Authors:  L Lacey; M Youle; P Trueman; S Staszewski; M Schrappe; M Behrens
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Lamivudine reduces healthcare resource use when added to zidovudine-containing regimens in patients with HIV infection.

Authors:  L Lacey; M J Gill
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  An evaluation of the cost effectiveness of adding lamivudine to zidovudine-containing regimens in HIV infection. Canadian perspective.

Authors:  L Lacey; P K Hopkinson; J Montaner; F Leblanc; M J Gill
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Economic analysis of initial HIV treatment. Efavirenz- versus indinavir-containing triple therapy.

Authors:  J J Caro; J A O'Brien; K Migliaccio-Walle; G Raggio
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.981

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.