Literature DB >> 10537337

Inter- and intrapatient variability in etoposide kinetics with oral and intravenous drug administration.

K Hande1, M Messenger, J Wagner, M Krozely, S Kaul.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to accurately determine the within- and between-patient variability in etoposide pharmacokinetics for i.v. and p.o. administered drug. Inter-and intrapatient variability in systemic etoposide exposure was measured following i.v. and p.o. drug administration using stable isotope dilution methodology. Seven patients received 50 mg of etoposide by both p.o. and i.v. routes of administration on three separate occasions 1 month apart. Etoposide plasma concentrations following p.o. and i.v. drug administration were quantitated by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for each route of administration. The area under the plasma etoposide concentration versus time curve, plasma etoposide clearance, and etoposide plasma half-life were calculated for each dose of drug. Kinetic measurements following i.v. and p.o. drug administration were compared. The within-patient variation in the areas under the plasma etoposide concentration versus time curves following i.v. drug administration was minimal [coefficient of variation (CV) = 9.3%]. Within-patient variability was increased 2.4-fold with oral drug administration (intrapatient CV = 22.2%). Between-patient variability was roughly three times as great as within-patient variability (interpatient i.v. CV = 28.4%; interpatient p.o. CV = 58.3%). Mean etoposide bioavailability at a dose of 50 mg was 64.6%, again with greater interpatient than intrapatient variability (34.8 versus 22.6%). Greater variation in drug toxicity is expected with p.o. compared with i.v. etoposide use. Administration of repeated doses of etoposide to the same patient should produce less variation in toxicity than between-patient dosing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10537337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  14 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacology of anticancer drugs in the elderly population.

Authors:  Hans Wildiers; Martin S Highley; Ernst A de Bruijn; Allan T van Oosterom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Prescribing oral chemotherapy.

Authors:  Sandeep D Parsad; Mark J Ratain
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-02-24

Review 3.  Oral anticancer drugs: mechanisms of low bioavailability and strategies for improvement.

Authors:  Frederik E Stuurman; Bastiaan Nuijen; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Within- and between- subject variability in methadone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in methadone maintenance subjects.

Authors:  Julia Hanna; David J R Foster; Amy Salter; Andrew A Somogyi; Jason M White; Felix Bochner
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  In vitro cytotoxicity of novel platinum-based drugs and dichloroacetate against lung carcinoid cell lines.

Authors:  Wolfgang Fiebiger; Ulrike Olszewski; Ernst Ulsperger; Klaus Geissler; Gerhard Hamilton
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 6.  Grapefruit-drug interactions.

Authors:  Kay Seden; Laura Dickinson; Saye Khoo; David Back
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment with oral etoposide.

Authors:  Giuseppe Toffoli; Giuseppe Corona; Barbara Basso; Mauro Boiocchi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Pharmaceutical and pharmacological approaches for bioavailability enhancement of etoposide.

Authors:  Ishtiyaq Ahmad Najar; Rakesh Kamal Johri
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Population pharmacokinetic analysis of abiraterone in chemotherapy-naïve and docetaxel-treated patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kim Stuyckens; Fred Saad; Xu Steven Xu; Charles J Ryan; Matthew R Smith; Thomas W Griffin; Margaret K Yu; An Vermeulen; Partha Nandy; Italo Poggesi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 10.  Camptothecin and podophyllotoxin derivatives: inhibitors of topoisomerase I and II - mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics and toxicity profile.

Authors:  Jörg T Hartmann; Hans-Peter Lipp
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.