Literature DB >> 10536547

Direct measurement of mucosal pressures exerted by cuff and non-cuff portions of tracheal tubes with different cuff volumes and head and neck positions.

J Brimacombe1, C Keller, M Giampalmo, H J Sparr, A Berry.   

Abstract

We measured directly mucosal pressures against the cuff and non-cuff portions of the tracheal tube in different head-neck positions and tested the reliability of calculated mucosal pressures, in vivo intracuff pressures and cuff volume as determinants of directly measured mucosal pressures. We studied 10 anaesthetized, paralysed adult patients. An 8.5-mm, high volume, low pressure PVC tracheal tube was used. Microchip sensors were attached to three cuff locations (anterior, lateral and posterior) and two non-cuff locations (anterior tip and anterior aspect of the tube, 5 cm proximal to the cuff). Directly measured mucosal pressures, in vivo intracuff pressures and calculated mucosal pressures (in vivo minus in vitro intracuff pressures) were determined after brief inflation (< 15 s) to 0, 5, 10 and 15 ml. In vivo intracuff pressures were then set at 30 mm Hg and the measurements repeated, first in the neutral position and then with the head-neck extended, flexed and rotated. Cuff mucosal pressures were highest anteriorly and lowest posteriorly. Non-cuff mucosal pressures did not vary with cuff volume and were approximately 15 mm Hg. Compared with the neutral position, in vivo intracuff pressures were higher in the rotated, extended and flexed positions. Compared with the neutral position, mucosal pressure increased on the anterior aspect of the tube in the flexed position by 22 mm Hg (P = 0.003), at the anterior tip in the extended position by 11 mm Hg (P = 0.002) and at the anterior tip (5 mm Hg, P = 0.05) and lateral aspect of the cuff (5 mm Hg, P = 0.03) in the rotated position. In vivo intracuff pressures and calculated mucosal pressures were moderate predictors of measured mucosal pressures; cuff volume was a poor predictor. We conclude that tracheal mucosal pressures were highest anteriorly, that non-cuff portions of the tube exerted substantial mucosal pressures and that the rotated position caused a greater increase in tracheal mucosal pressure than the extended or flexed position. Indirect methods of measuring mucosal pressure were of moderate predictive value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10536547     DOI: 10.1093/bja/82.5.708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  12 in total

1.  The effect of mouth prop on endotracheal tube intracuff pressure in children during dental rehabilitation under general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Dilek Günay Canpolat; Kenan Cantekin; Adnan Bayram; Mustafa Denizhan Yıldırım
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Changes in cuff pressure of endotracheal tube during laparoscopic and open abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Zeynep Baysal Yildirim; Ali Uzunkoy; Ali Cigdem; Suleyman Ganidagli; Abdullah Ozgonul
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Handcrafted cuff manometers do not accurately measure endotracheal tube cuff pressure.

Authors:  Raquel Annoni; Antonio Evanir de Almeida Junior
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2015-09-15

4.  Arytenoid cartilage dislocation after reversed total shoulder replacement surgery in the beach chair position: a case report.

Authors:  Yeo Hae Sim; Jeong-Hyun Choi; Mi Kyeong Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-07-01

5.  Comparison of the cuff pressure of a TaperGuard endotracheal tube and a cylindrical endotracheal tube after lateral rotation of head during middle ear surgery: A single-blind, randomized clinical consort study.

Authors:  Eunkyung Choi; Yongmin Park; Younghoon Jeon
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  A canine model of tracheal stenosis induced by cuffed endotracheal intubation.

Authors:  Zhuquan Su; Shiyue Li; Ziqing Zhou; Xiaobo Chen; Yingying Gu; Yu Chen; Changhao Zhong; Minglu Zhong; Nanshan Zhong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Endotracheal cuff pressure changes with change in position in neurosurgical patients.

Authors:  UmeshKumar Athiraman; Rohit Gupta; Georgene Singh
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

8.  Measuring endotracheal tube intracuff pressure: no room for complacency.

Authors:  Chandra M Kumar; Edwin Seet; Tom C R V Van Zundert
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Comparison of the cuff pressures of a TaperGuard endotracheal tube during ipsilateral and contralateral rotation of the head: A randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Saeyoung Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Assessing the accuracy of ultrasound measurements of tracheal diameter: an in vitro experimental study.

Authors:  Ran Ye; Feifei Cai; Chengnan Guo; Xiaocheng Zhang; Dan Yan; Chengshui Chen; Bin Chen
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.