Literature DB >> 10536088

The scaling of basicranial flexion and length.

D S Strait1.   

Abstract

Based on correlations between the cranial base angle (CBA) and the index of relative encephalization (IRE, calculated as the cubed root of brain volume divided by basicranial length), several recent studies have identified relative brain size as the factor most responsible for determining basicranial flexion in primates. IRE, however, scales with positive allometry relative to body mass, unlike the negatively allometric relationship between brain volume and body mass. This poses new questions concerning the factors underlying the correlation between IRE and CBA. Specifically, if basicranial flexion represents a spatial solution to the problem of housing a large brain within a neurocranium of limited size, then why is it that the problem is greatest in those species whose brains are smallest relative to body mass? To address this question, the scaling relationships of IRE and the measurements used to calculate it were examined in 87 primate species. It was found that the positive allometry of IRE is due to the fact that its denominator, basicranial length (BL), scales with very strong negative allometry relative to body mass. The scaling relationship of BL may reflect the fact that the noncortical components of the brain (i.e., diencephalon, mesencephalon, medulla) also scale with strong negative allometry relative to body mass, perhaps because of energetic constraints. Importantly, BL and these three brain components scale isometrically against each other. Thus, although cranial base flexion may be an adaptation to accommodate the size of the brain relative to basicranial length, the reason why that adaptation is necessary is not the evolution of a large brain, but rather the evolution of a short cranial base. In so far as basicranial length is affected by the strong negative allometry of the diencephalon, mesencephalon and medulla, the scaling relationships of these brain components are therefore indirectly responsible for the evolution of basicranial flexion. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10536088     DOI: 10.1006/jhev.1999.0314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  9 in total

Review 1.  Cranial base evolution within the hominin clade.

Authors:  L Nevell; B Wood
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Skull base embryology: a multidisciplinary review.

Authors:  Antonio Di Ieva; Emiliano Bruner; Thomas Haider; Luigi F Rodella; John M Lee; Michael D Cusimano; Manfred Tschabitscher
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Genetically induced abnormal cranial development in human trisomy 18 with holoprosencephaly: comparisons with the normal tempo of osteogenic-neural development.

Authors:  Shaina N Reid; Janine M Ziermann; Marjorie C Gondré-Lewis
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Craniofacial growth in fetal Tarsius bancanus: brains, eyes and nasal septa.

Authors:  Nathan Jeffery; Karen Davies; Walter Köckenberger; Steve Williams
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Effects of cranial integration on hominid endocranial shape.

Authors:  Christoph P E Zollikofer; Thibaut Bienvenu; Marcia S Ponce de León
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Spatial packing, cranial base angulation, and craniofacial shape variation in the mammalian skull: testing a new model using mice.

Authors:  Daniel E Lieberman; Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Wei Liu; Trish E Parsons; Heather A Jamniczky
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 7.  Cranial shape and size variation in human evolution: structural and functional perspectives.

Authors:  Emiliano Bruner
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Facial shape manifestations of growth faltering in Tanzanian children.

Authors:  Joanne B Cole; Mange F Manyama; Dejana Nikitovic; Paula N Gonzalez; Denise K Liberton; Warren M Wilson; Campbell Rolian; Jacinda R Larson; Emmanuel Kimwaga; Joshua Mathayo; Charles C Roseman; Stephanie A Santorico; Ken Lukowiak; Richard A Spritz; Benedikt Hallgrimsson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Three-dimensional geometric morphometric studies of modern human occipital variation.

Authors:  Yameng Zhang; Lynne A Schepartz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.