Literature DB >> 10535862

Rhinostomies: an open and shut case?

C J McLean1, I A Cree, G E Rose.   

Abstract

AIMS: To analyse bone fragments from rhinostomies of patients undergoing revisional dacryocystorhinostomy, looking for evidence of new bone formation.
METHODS: 14 consecutive patients undergoing secondary lacrimal surgery were included in this study. In each case the existing rhinostomy was enlarged with bone punches, care being taken to use the punches with the jaws cutting perpendicularly to the edge of the rhinostomy, to allow accurate orientation of the specimens. The fragments were examined histologically for evidence of new bone formation.
RESULTS: Histological sections showed fragments of bone with variable fibrosis at the edge of the rhinostomy. There was evidence of only very little new bone formation.
CONCLUSION: This study has clearly shown that, at the edge of a rhinostomy, healing is predominantly by fibrosis and there is only very limited new bone formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10535862      PMCID: PMC1722857          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.83.11.1300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  9 in total

1.  Dacryocystorhinostomy; clinical report of fifty cases.

Authors:  G J ROMANES
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1955-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Dacryocystorhinostomy; a review of 106 operations.

Authors:  S D McPHERSON; D EGLESTON
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1959-03       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Results of dacryocystorhinostomy analysis of causes for failure.

Authors:  R A Welham; P H Henderson
Journal:  Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K       Date:  1973

4.  A simplified dacryocystorhinostomy. 1954-1970.

Authors:  C E Iliff
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1971-05

5.  A modified technique of external dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  G Picó
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Management of unsuccessful lacrimal surgery.

Authors:  R A Welham; A E Wulc
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Results of dacryocystorhinostomy: analysis of the reoperations.

Authors:  D L McLachlan; G M Shannon; J C Flanagan
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1980-07

8.  Dacryocystorhinostomy with intraoperative mitomycin C.

Authors:  S C Kao; C L Liao; J H Tseng; M S Chen; P K Hou
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Evaluation of dacryocystorhinostomy failure with computed tomography and computed tomographic dacryocystography.

Authors:  H J Glatt; A C Chan; L Barrett
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-10-15       Impact factor: 5.258

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  A comparison of endonasal with external dacryocystorhinostomy in revision cases.

Authors:  Arzu Yasemin Korkut; Aysenur Meric Teker; Mustafa Ozsutcu; Omer Askiner; Orhan Gedikli
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.503

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.