Literature DB >> 10535435

Prognostic value of 24-hour blood pressure in pregnancy.

G Bellomo1, P L Narducci, F Rondoni, G Pastorelli, G Stangoni, G Angeli, P Verdecchia.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Elevated blood pressure (BP) measured at the physician's office may reflect true hypertension or white coat hypertension (WCH). The prognostic value of WCH among pregnant women is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic value of WCH in pregnancy.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study conducted between September 1994 and October 1997.
SETTING: Community hospital. PATIENTS: Women without preexisting hypertension and not treated with antihypertensive drugs aid with high (n = 148) or normal (n = 106) office BP (high office BP was defined as > or =140 mm Hg systolic and/or > or =90 mm Hg diastolic) matched for gestational age during their third trimester of pregnancy. All women underwent 24-hour noninvasive BP monitoring, and women without hypertension on 24-hour monitoring (125/74 mm Hg or less for average 24-hour BP) with office hypertension were classified as having WCH. Women were followed up through the end of pregnancy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Duration of pregnancy, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia or eclampsia, cesarean delivery, placental and neonatal weight, and length of maternal and neonatal hospital stays for those with and without elevated office BP.
RESULTS: After application of exclusion criteria, data for 7 women were removed from the analysis. For the remaining subjects, in the group with elevated BP, prevalence of WCH was 29.2% (42/144). Duration of pregnancy was similar in the normotensive and WCH groups (39.6 vs 39.8 weeks; P = .50), but shorter (38.3 weeks; P<.001) in the true hypertension group. Incidence of preeclampsia was similar in the normotensive and WCH groups (5.8% vs 7.1 %; P = .86) but higher in the true hypertension group (61.7%; P<.001). Frequency of cesarean delivery was lower in the normotensive (12.4%) than in the WCH (45.2%; P = .008) and true hypertension (41.1 %; P = .009) groups. Neonatal weight was lower (P<.001) in the true hypertension (mean, 2911 g) than in the normotensive (3336 g) and WCH groups (3435 g), which did not differ (P = .68). The duration of neonatal hospital stay did not differ between the normotensive and the WCH group (5.3 vs 6.9 days; P = .13) but was longer in the true hypertension group (12.3 days; P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In women with elevated BP during their third trimester of pregnancy, 24-hour BP was superior to office BP (distinguishing true hypertension from WCH) for prediction of the outcome of pregnancy. Outcomes in the normotensive and WCH group were comparable, but the increased incidence of cesarean delivery in the WCH group may reflect decision-making processes influenced by office BP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10535435     DOI: 10.1001/jama.282.15.1447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  22 in total

Review 1.  Use and interpretation of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: recommendations of the British hypertension society.

Authors:  E O'Brien; A Coats; P Owens; J Petrie; P L Padfield; W A Littler; M de Swiet; F Mee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-22

Review 2.  ABC of hypertension. Blood pressure measurement. Part III-automated sphygmomanometry: ambulatory blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  E O'Brien; G Beevers; G Y Lip
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-05

3.  Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitor heart rate: a potential marker for gestational hypertension in at-risk women.

Authors:  Corenthian J Booker; William C Dodson; Allen R Kunselman; John T Repke; Richard S Legro
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Ambulatory BP monitoring and clinic BP in predicting small-for-gestational-age infants during pregnancy.

Authors:  K Eguchi; T Ohmaru; A Ohkuchi; C Hirashima; K Takahashi; H Suzuki; K Kario; S Matsubara; Mitsuaki Suzuki
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.012

5.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring profile as a useful prognostic tool in patients with primary hypertension.

Authors:  A L Mohamed; E Katiman; J Abu Hassan
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2003-07

6.  Italian society of hypertension guidelines for conventional and automated blood pressure measurement in the office, at home and over 24 hours.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Stefano Omboni; Paolo Palatini; Damiano Rizzoni; Grzegorz Bilo; Mariaconsuelo Valentini; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Giuseppe Mancia
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2013-01-22

7.  Hostility and anomie: links to preterm delivery subtypes and ambulatory blood pressure at mid-pregnancy.

Authors:  LindaBeth Tiedje; Claudia B Holzman; Eric De Vos; Xu Jia; Steve Korzeniewski; Mohammad H Rahbar; Monica M Goble; David Kallen
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: a joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society Of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; Nancy Houston Miller; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Lawrence R Krakoff; Nancy T Artinian; David Goff
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 9.  Out of Office Blood Pressure Measurement in Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period.

Authors:  Natalie A Bello; Eliza Miller; Kirsten Cleary; Ronald Wapner; Daichi Shimbo; Alan T Tita
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.369

10.  Reflections in hypertension. How should blood pressure be measured during pregnancy?

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.