Literature DB >> 10534583

Cold-evoked pain varies with skin type and cooling rate: a psychophysical study in humans.

J L Harrison1, K D Davis.   

Abstract

The psychophysical responses to noxious cold stimulation of the skin in normal human subjects are not well understood. Continuous pain ratings with the visual analogue scale is an important method to assess these responses. In this study, we addressed several important issues about the parameters with which stimuli are delivered: the type of skin stimulated, the rate with which the stimulus temperature decreases, and the dimension of the pain rated by subjects. Cold stimuli were delivered to the thenar eminence (glabrous skin) and the dorso-lateral hand (hairy skin) via a 4 cm(2) Peltier-type stimulator. Cold and pain thresholds were determined by the method of limits (MOL). A computerized visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to obtain continuous ratings of pain intensity and affect. The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) was used to assess the quality of cold-evoked pain. Supra-threshold stimuli (34 degrees C base) were delivered at 0.5, 1 or 2 degrees C/s to 2 degrees C, held for 20s and returned to baseline at 9 degrees C/s. These studies revealed: (1) Cold thresholds, measured with MOL, were lower (i.e. occurred at higher absolute temperatures) for the hairy skin of the dorso-lateral hand compared to the glabrous skin of the thenar eminence. (2) A similar pattern was evident for cold induced pain thresholds with MOL at 1.5 degrees C/s and with intensity and affect VAS scales at 0.5 and 1 degrees C/s. (3) Exponents for supra-threshold ratings fit to power functions were larger for the glabrous skin site than the hairy skin site regardless of cooling rate or dimension of pain measured. (4) All pain indices were higher for slower cooling rates. (5) No significant differences were found in the pain indices for pain ratings of intensity and affect. (6) A substantial proportion of subjects chose words representing paradoxical heat with the MPQ. (7) Painful paradoxical heat sensations occurred most often during cooling, while innocuous warm sensations mainly occurred during the rewarming phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10534583     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00099-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  20 in total

1.  Spatial summation of thermal sensations depends on skin type and skin sensitivity.

Authors:  Ruth Defrin; Laura Petrini; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Scraping through the ice: uncovering the role of TRPM8 in cold transduction.

Authors:  Daniel D McCoy; Wendy M Knowlton; David D McKemy
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Body regional heat pain thresholds using the method of limit and level: a comparative study.

Authors:  Sungjin Park; Sang-Hyun Roh; Joo-Young Lee
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Human medullary responses to cooling and rewarming the skin: a functional MRI study.

Authors:  Robin M McAllen; Michael Farrell; John M Johnson; David Trevaks; Leonie Cole; Michael J McKinley; Graeme Jackson; Derek A Denton; Gary F Egan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The coding of cutaneous temperature in the spinal cord.

Authors:  Chen Ran; Mark A Hoon; Xiaoke Chen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 6.  Assessing analgesic actions of opioids by experimental pain models in healthy volunteers - an updated review.

Authors:  Camilla Staahl; Anne Estrup Olesen; Trine Andresen; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Diversity in the neural circuitry of cold sensing revealed by genetic axonal labeling of transient receptor potential melastatin 8 neurons.

Authors:  Yoshio Takashima; Richard L Daniels; Wendy Knowlton; James Teng; Emily R Liman; David D McKemy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Roles of transient receptor potential channels in pain.

Authors:  Cheryl L Stucky; Adrienne E Dubin; Nathaniel A Jeske; Sacha A Malin; David D McKemy; Gina M Story
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2008-12-31

9.  Offset analgesia: a temporal contrast mechanism for nociceptive information.

Authors:  Marc D Yelle; June M Rogers; Robert C Coghill
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Transient receptor potential channel A1 and noxious cold responses in rat cutaneous nociceptors.

Authors:  J P Dunham; J L Leith; B M Lumb; L F Donaldson
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.