Literature DB >> 10533909

Leukocyte adhesion molecules and leukocyte-platelet interactions during hemodialysis: effects of different synthetic membranes.

V Sirolli1, E Ballone, L Amoroso, L Di Liberato, R Di Mascio, P Capelli, A Albertazzi, M Bonomini.   

Abstract

Membranes made from synthetic polymers, in general, are considered as being biocompatible membranes and tend to be treated as a homogeneous group. However, all of these membranes have multiple and different characteristics that may contribute to interactions with blood components. As a consequence, the biocompatibility profile of synthetic membranes may vary. In the present cross-over study, we examined by flow cytometry the effects (expressed as % change from predialysis values) of three different synthetic polymers (polysulfone, PSF; polyacrylonitrile-co-sodium methallyl sulfonate, AN69; ethylenevinylalcohol, EVAL) on the expression of leukocyte adhesion molecules (CD11b/CD18, CD15s) and the interactions between leukocytes and platelets under conditions of routine clinical use. For neutrophils, a statistically significant difference was found in CD15s expression for EVAL as compared to AN69 (p<0.05) and in CD11b/CD18 expression for PSF as compared to both EVAL (p<0.01) and AN69 (p<0.05). No difference between membranes was found on the expression of such adhesive molecules on monocytes. Significant differences in platelet-neutrophil (but not in platelet-monocyte) coaggregate formation were observed between PSF and both EVAL (p<0.001) and AN69 (p<0.01). Reactive oxygen species production by neutrophil population during hemodialysis was significantly different between each pair of synthetic polymers (PSF vs EVAL, p<0.001; PSF vs AN69, p<0.001; AN69 vs EVAL, p<0.05). Our data demonstrate that in terms of leukocyte adhesion receptors and platelet-leukocyte interactions, the biocompatibility profile of the synthetic membranes polysulphone, AN69 and EVAL shows many similarities but also several significant differences. Our results support the concept that biocompatibility evaluation of each membrane should be based exclusively on data generated by that membrane in order to avoid errors based on assumptions about group characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10533909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Artif Organs        ISSN: 0391-3988            Impact factor:   1.595


  9 in total

Review 1.  High-flux versus low-flux membranes for end-stage kidney disease.

Authors:  Suetonia C Palmer; Kannaiyan S Rabindranath; Jonathan C Craig; Paul J Roderick; Francesco Locatelli; Giovanni F M Strippoli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

2.  Effects of fluid flow on elution of hydrophilic modifier from dialysis membrane surfaces.

Authors:  Masato Matsuda; Mika Sato; Hiroki Sakata; Takahisa Ogawa; Ken-ichiro Yamamoto; Taiji Yakushiji; Makoto Fukuda; Takehiro Miyasaka; Kiyotaka Sakai
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2008-10-05       Impact factor: 1.731

3.  Resolution of dialyzer membrane-associated thrombocytopenia with use of cellulose triacetate membrane: a case report.

Authors:  Feyisayo Olafiranye; Win Kyaw; Oladipupo Olafiranye
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2011-04-10

4.  Flux and Passage Enhancement in Hemodialysis by Incorporating Compound Additive into PVDF Polymer Matrix.

Authors:  Qinglei Zhang; Xiaolong Lu; Qingzhao Zhang; Lei Zhang; Suoding Li; Shaobin Liu
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-19

5.  Case studies of clinical hemodialysis membranes: influences of membrane morphology and biocompatibility on uremic blood-membrane interactions and inflammatory biomarkers.

Authors:  Heloisa Westphalen; Shaghayegh Saadati; Ubong Eduok; Amira Abdelrasoul; Ahmed Shoker; Phillip Choi; Huu Doan; Farhad Ein-Mozaffari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A Bifunctional Adsorber Particle for the Removal of Hydrophobic Uremic Toxins from Whole Blood of Renal Failure Patients.

Authors:  Marieke Sternkopf; Sven Thoröe-Boveleth; Tobias Beck; Kirsten Oleschko; Ansgar Erlenkötter; Ulrich Tschulena; Sonja Steppan; Thimoteus Speer; Claudia Goettsch; Vera Jankowski; Joachim Jankowski; Heidi Noels
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.546

7.  Poly(ethylene-Co-vinyl Alcohol)/Titanium Dioxide Nanocomposite: Preparation and Characterization of Properties for Potential Use in Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Waseem Sharaf Saeed; Dalal H Alotaibi; Abdel-Basit Al-Odayni; Ahmed S Haidyrah; Ahmad Abdulaziz Al-Owais; Rawaiz Khan; Merry Angelyn Tan De Vera; Ali Alrahlah; Taieb Aouak
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Current approaches to middle molecule removal: room for innovation.

Authors:  Ikuto Masakane; Kenji Sakurai
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.992

9.  Hemoperfusion leads to impairment in hemostasis and coagulation process in patients with acute pesticide intoxication.

Authors:  Samel Park; Md-Imtiazul Islam; Ji-Hun Jeong; Nam-Jun Cho; Ho-Yeon Song; Eun-Young Lee; Hyo-Wook Gil
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.