BACKGROUND: This is the first report of results from the EURODEP Programme. AIMS: To assess the prevalence of depression judged suitable for intervention in randomised samples of those aged > or = 65 in nine European centres. METHOD: The GMS-AGECAT package. RESULTS: Differences in prevalence are apparent, 8.8% (Iceland) to 236% (Munich). When sub-cases and cases are added together, five high- and four low-scoring centres emerge. Women predominated over men. Proportions of sub-cases to cases revealed striking differences but did not explain prevalence. There was no constant association between prevalence and age. A meta-analysis (n = 13,808) gave an overall prevalence of 12.3%, 14.1% for women and 8.6% for men. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable variation occurs in the levels of depression across Europe, the cause for which is not immediately obvious. Case and sub-case levels taken together show greater variability, suggesting that it is not a matter of case/sub-case selection criteria, which were standardised by computer. Substantial levels of depression are shown but 62-82% of persons had no depressive level. Opportunities for treatment exist.
BACKGROUND: This is the first report of results from the EURODEP Programme. AIMS: To assess the prevalence of depression judged suitable for intervention in randomised samples of those aged > or = 65 in nine European centres. METHOD: The GMS-AGECAT package. RESULTS: Differences in prevalence are apparent, 8.8% (Iceland) to 236% (Munich). When sub-cases and cases are added together, five high- and four low-scoring centres emerge. Women predominated over men. Proportions of sub-cases to cases revealed striking differences but did not explain prevalence. There was no constant association between prevalence and age. A meta-analysis (n = 13,808) gave an overall prevalence of 12.3%, 14.1% for women and 8.6% for men. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable variation occurs in the levels of depression across Europe, the cause for which is not immediately obvious. Case and sub-case levels taken together show greater variability, suggesting that it is not a matter of case/sub-case selection criteria, which were standardised by computer. Substantial levels of depression are shown but 62-82% of persons had no depressive level. Opportunities for treatment exist.
Authors: John R M Copeland; Aartjan T F Beekman; Arjan W Braam; Michael E Dewey; Philippe Delespaul; Rebecca Fuhrer; Christopher Hooijer; Brian A Lawlor; Sirkka-Liisa Kivela; Anthony Lobo; Halgrimur Magnusson; Anthony H Mann; Ingeborg Meller; Martin J Prince; Friedel Reischies; Marc Roelands; Ingmar Skoog; Cesare Turrina; Marten W deVries; Kenneth C M Wilson Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Christopher Dowrick; José Luis Ayuso-Mateos; José Luis Vazquez-Barquero; Graham Dunn; Odd Steffen Dalgard; Ville Lehtinen; Patricia Casey; Clare Wilkinson; Helen Page; Lourdes Lasa; Erin E Michalak; Greg Wilkinson Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: David C Steffens; Gwenith G Fisher; Kenneth M Langa; Guy G Potter; Brenda L Plassman Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2009-06-12 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Afaf H Khalil; Menan A Rabie; Mohamed F Abd-El-Aziz; Tarek A Abdou; Amany H El-Rasheed; Walaa M Sabry Journal: Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health Date: 2010-10-10 Impact factor: 3.033