Literature DB >> 10533071

Comparison of heteroduplex analysis, direct sequencing, and enzyme mismatch cleavage for detecting mutations in a large gene, FBN1.

B Yuan1, J P Thomas, Y von Kodolitsch, R E Pyeritz.   

Abstract

Analysis of large genes for mutations of clinical relevance is complicated by intragenic heterogeneity, sensitivity, and cost of the methods available, and in the case of many conditions, specificity of the genetic alterations detected. We examined the FBN1 gene for mutations in people who had Marfan syndrome using three methods: single-chain polymorphism analysis (SSCP) with heteroduplex (HA) analysis, enzyme-mediated cleavage (EMC) of heteroduplexes, and direct sequencing. We also used these methods to search for mutations in the P53 gene in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The results showed that EMC was most efficient for detecting mutations. However, the cost favored SSCP with heteroduplex analysis, provided conditions did not need to be optimized to detect a mutation. Until more cost-effective and sensitive methods are developed to detect unknown mutations in large genes, diagnosis of many genetic disorders will depend on the willingness of an investigator who is studying a particular disorder to perform clinical molecular testing and have the laboratory accredited. Copyright 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10533071     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(199911)14:5<440::AID-HUMU11>3.0.CO;2-P

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


  5 in total

Review 1.  Genetic counseling for congenital heart disease: new approaches for a new decade.

Authors:  Katy Hoess; Elizabeth Goldmuntz; Reed E Pyeritz
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Evaluating the arrayed primer extension resequencing assay of TP53 tumor suppressor gene.

Authors:  Neeme Tõnisson; Jana Zernant; Ants Kurg; Hendrik Pavel; Georg Slavin; Hanno Roomere; Aune Meiel; Pierre Hainaut; Andres Metspalu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Difficulties in diagnosing Marfan syndrome using current FBN1 databases.

Authors:  Kristian A Groth; Mette Gaustadnes; Kasper Thorsen; John R Østergaard; Uffe Birk Jensen; Claus H Gravholt; Niels H Andersen
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Human Splicing Finder: an online bioinformatics tool to predict splicing signals.

Authors:  François-Olivier Desmet; Dalil Hamroun; Marine Lalande; Gwenaëlle Collod-Béroud; Mireille Claustres; Christophe Béroud
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  New population-based exome data question the pathogenicity of some genetic variants previously associated with Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Ren-Qiang Yang; Javad Jabbari; Xiao-Shu Cheng; Reza Jabbari; Jonas B Nielsen; Bjarke Risgaard; Xu Chen; Ahmad Sajadieh; Stig Haunsø; Jesper Hastrup Svendsen; Morten S Olesen; Jacob Tfelt-Hansen
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 2.797

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.