A de la Taille1, O R Hayek, R Buttyan, E Bagiella, M Burchardt, A E Katz. 1. The Squier Urological Clinic, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, Department of Urology, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the in vitro activity of PC-SPES, a complex phytotherapeutic agent, against prostate cancer cell lines, and to assess its activity in suppressing serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level in patients with prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four variant prostate cancer cell lines (LNCaP and an apoptosis-resistant derivative, LNCaP-bcl-2, PC3 and DU145) were exposed to three different concentrations of PC-SPES extract. Cell viability was measured at 3, 4 and 5 days of exposure using a colorimetric assay and was compared with control cultures receiving aliquots of the ethanolic extraction medium alone. Clinically, a prospective study was initiated in patients with prostate cancer who refused conventional therapy or who had failed previous cryosurgery, radiation therapy and/or hormonal therapy. The patients were treated with PC-SPES (three capsules of 320 mg/day). The serum PSA responses and side-effects were evaluated. RESULTS: All cultured prostate cancer cell lines showed a significant dose-dependent reduction in cellular viability (compared with control cultures) by exposure to 4 and 6 microL of PC-SPES extract/mL of culture medium (P<0.001). In contrast to the hormone-insensitive cell lines tested (LNCaP-bcl-2, PC-3 and DU-145), only the hormone-sensitive cell line LNCaP was affected by the lowest dose of PC-SPES extract tested (2 microL/mL medium). In the prospective clinical trial of 33 patients, with a mean (range) follow-up of 6.8 (2-24) months after initiating PC-SPES therapy, serum PSA levels were lower in 87% at 2 months and in 78% at 6 months (n=18, P=0.026). The side-effects in these patients were nipple tenderness in two (6%) and leg clots requiring heparinization in two (6%). No gynaecomastia or hot flashes were observed in this group and the treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study, an extract of the phytotherapeutic agent PC-SPES was active in suppressing the growth of cultured hormone-sensitive and -insensitive prostate cancer cell lines. In the small clinical study, PC-SPES therapy decreased serum PSA levels in most patients. However, a longer follow-up and more patients will be required to evaluate the long-term efficacy of this new phytotherapy.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the in vitro activity of PC-SPES, a complex phytotherapeutic agent, against prostate cancer cell lines, and to assess its activity in suppressing serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level in patients with prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four variant prostate cancer cell lines (LNCaP and an apoptosis-resistant derivative, LNCaP-bcl-2, PC3 and DU145) were exposed to three different concentrations of PC-SPES extract. Cell viability was measured at 3, 4 and 5 days of exposure using a colorimetric assay and was compared with control cultures receiving aliquots of the ethanolic extraction medium alone. Clinically, a prospective study was initiated in patients with prostate cancer who refused conventional therapy or who had failed previous cryosurgery, radiation therapy and/or hormonal therapy. The patients were treated with PC-SPES (three capsules of 320 mg/day). The serum PSA responses and side-effects were evaluated. RESULTS: All cultured prostate cancer cell lines showed a significant dose-dependent reduction in cellular viability (compared with control cultures) by exposure to 4 and 6 microL of PC-SPES extract/mL of culture medium (P<0.001). In contrast to the hormone-insensitive cell lines tested (LNCaP-bcl-2, PC-3 and DU-145), only the hormone-sensitive cell line LNCaP was affected by the lowest dose of PC-SPES extract tested (2 microL/mL medium). In the prospective clinical trial of 33 patients, with a mean (range) follow-up of 6.8 (2-24) months after initiating PC-SPES therapy, serum PSA levels were lower in 87% at 2 months and in 78% at 6 months (n=18, P=0.026). The side-effects in these patients were nipple tenderness in two (6%) and leg clots requiring heparinization in two (6%). No gynaecomastia or hot flashes were observed in this group and the treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study, an extract of the phytotherapeutic agent PC-SPES was active in suppressing the growth of cultured hormone-sensitive and -insensitive prostate cancer cell lines. In the small clinical study, PC-SPES therapy decreased serum PSA levels in most patients. However, a longer follow-up and more patients will be required to evaluate the long-term efficacy of this new phytotherapy.