Literature DB >> 10531630

Three oral formulations of methadone. A clinical and pharmacodynamic comparison.

M N Gourevitch1, D Hartel, P Tenore, K Freeman, I Marion, J Hecht, J Lowinson.   

Abstract

This study was done to determine whether there were any differences in subjective symptoms of opiate withdrawal or methadone pharmacodynamics among patients as they were switched between three different oral formulations of methadone. Patients enrolled in a three-way double-blind crossover trial of three methadone formulations. Subjective symptoms and pharmacodynamic measures were assessed throughout the study period. Eighteen patients were enrolled the study. No statistically significant differences in any of the pharmacodynamic parameters studied were found among the three methadone preparations. There was no significant difference among preparations in the rate and extent of rise and fall in plasma methadone levels during a 24-hour intensive sampling period. Subjective symptoms also did not correlate with methadone formulation. Intolerance to changes in methadone formulation, often observed clinically, do not appear to have a pharmacodynamic basis. Our findings support the notion that such change intolerance reflects factors other than the pharmacologic properties of the different formulations of methadone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10531630     DOI: 10.1016/s0740-5472(99)00008-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat        ISSN: 0740-5472


  9 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of a new immediate-release methadone tablet formulation with decreased in vitro solubility.

Authors:  Robert K Vinson
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  Negotiating structural vulnerability following regulatory changes to a provincial methadone program in Vancouver, Canada: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Ryan McNeil; Thomas Kerr; Solanna Anderson; Lisa Maher; Chereece Keewatin; M J Milloy; Evan Wood; Will Small
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 3.  Interindividual variability of the clinical pharmacokinetics of methadone: implications for the treatment of opioid dependence.

Authors:  Chin B Eap; Thierry Buclin; Pierre Baumann
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Prevalence of Heavy Alcohol Use Among People Receiving Methadone Following Change to Methadose.

Authors:  Jan Klimas; Evan Wood; Ekaterina Nosova; M-J Milloy; Thomas Kerr; Kanna Hayashi
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.164

5.  Unintended impacts of regulatory changes to British Columbia Methadone Maintenance Program on addiction and HIV-related outcomes: An interrupted time series analysis.

Authors:  M Eugenia Socías; Evan Wood; Ryan McNeil; Thomas Kerr; Huiru Dong; Jean Shoveller; Julio Montaner; M-J Milloy
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2017-04-25

6. 

Authors:  Matias Raski; Christy Sutherland; Rupinder Brar
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  From methadone to Methadose: Lessons learned from methadone formulation change in British Columbia.

Authors:  Matias Raski; Christy Sutherland; Rupinder Brar
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 8.  Gender differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of methadone substitution therapy.

Authors:  Manuela Graziani; Robert Nisticò
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Patient perspectives of methadone formulation change in British Columbia, Canada: outcomes of a provincial survey.

Authors:  Alissa M Greer; Sherry Hu; Ashraf Amlani; Sarah Moreheart; Olivia Sampson; Jane A Buxton
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2016-01-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.