OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic value of resting Tc-99m sestamibi scanning for adverse cardiac events (ACEs) in ED chest pain patients with a low probability of acute cardiac ischemia (ACI). METHODS: Sixty-nine consenting, hemodynamically stable patients with chest pain and a nondiagnostic electrocardiogram received an injection of 25 mCi of sestamibi during or within two hours of active pain. Scans were interpreted locally by a nuclear cardiologist or radiologist. Interrater reliability was assessed. ACEs of myocardial infarction (MI), death, or revascularization were assessed during the index hospitalization and over a one-year follow-up period. RESULTS: For ACEs, rest scanning with sestamibi had a sensitivity of 71% (95% CI = 0.33 to 0.97), a specificity of 92% (95% CI = 0.82 to 0.97), and an accuracy of 90% (95% CI = 0.87 to 0.99). The positive predictive value was 50% (95% CI = 0.19 to 0.82) and the negative predictive value was 97% (95% CI = 0.87 to 0.98). Sestamibi scanning was highly discriminating, with 62% of patients with positive scans but only 3% with negative scans having ACEs (p<0.001, log rank test). CONCLUSION: In patients with low-risk chest pain, sestamibi scanning has good specificity and moderate sensitivity for ACEs over a 12-month period.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic value of resting Tc-99m sestamibi scanning for adverse cardiac events (ACEs) in ED chest painpatients with a low probability of acute cardiac ischemia (ACI). METHODS: Sixty-nine consenting, hemodynamically stable patients with chest pain and a nondiagnostic electrocardiogram received an injection of 25 mCi of sestamibi during or within two hours of active pain. Scans were interpreted locally by a nuclear cardiologist or radiologist. Interrater reliability was assessed. ACEs of myocardial infarction (MI), death, or revascularization were assessed during the index hospitalization and over a one-year follow-up period. RESULTS: For ACEs, rest scanning with sestamibi had a sensitivity of 71% (95% CI = 0.33 to 0.97), a specificity of 92% (95% CI = 0.82 to 0.97), and an accuracy of 90% (95% CI = 0.87 to 0.99). The positive predictive value was 50% (95% CI = 0.19 to 0.82) and the negative predictive value was 97% (95% CI = 0.87 to 0.98). Sestamibi scanning was highly discriminating, with 62% of patients with positive scans but only 3% with negative scans having ACEs (p<0.001, log rank test). CONCLUSION: In patients with low-risk chest pain, sestamibi scanning has good specificity and moderate sensitivity for ACEs over a 12-month period.
Authors: Flordeliza S Villanueva; Erxiong Lu; Shivani Bowry; Sevgi Kilic; Eric Tom; Jianjun Wang; Joan Gretton; John J Pacella; William R Wagner Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-01-08 Impact factor: 29.690