Literature DB >> 10530401

Relationship of total motile sperm count and percentage motile sperm to successful pregnancy rates following intrauterine insemination.

E B Pasqualotto1, J A Daitch, B N Hendin, T Falcone, A J Thomas, D R Nelson, A Agarwal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study sought (i) to investigate the relationship between postwash total motile sperm count and postwash percentage motile sperm in predicting successful intrauterine insemination and (ii) to determine the minimal postwash total motile sperm count required to achieve pregnancy with intrauterine insemination.
METHODS: Five hundred four women, who underwent 1636 intrauterine insemination cycles with their partner's sperm for infertility treatment from 1993 through 1995, were included in this retrospective study. All patient charts were reviewed for age, infertility etiology, ovarian stimulation regimens, semen characteristics, and treatment outcome. To determine the relationship between total motile sperm count and intrauterine insemination outcome, patients were grouped as (1) less than 0.5 million, (2) 0.5 to 1 million, (3) 1 to 5 million, (4) greater than 5 million, and (5) greater than 20 million.
RESULTS: Similar live birth rates (per cycle) were seen among the postwash total motile sperm count groups: group 1, 3.5%; group 2, 2.4%; group 3, 7.0%; group 4, 6.9%; and group 5, 7.0% (P = 0.37). However, regardless of the postwash total motile sperm count, the postwash motility predicted intrauterine insemination success at a cutoff value of 40%.
CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of postwash sperm motility, and not the postwash total motile sperm count, can predict successful intrauterine insemination outcome. Such information can be useful in counseling patients regarding their chance of success with intrauterine insemination and in determining when alternate methods of assisted reproduction may be a better approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10530401      PMCID: PMC3455631          DOI: 10.1023/a:1020598916080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  29 in total

1.  The effective cumulative pregnancy rate of different modes of treatment of male infertility.

Authors:  F Comhaire; S Milingos; A Liapi; S Gordts; R Campo; H Depypere; M Dhont; F Schoonjans
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.775

Review 2.  Intrauterine insemination: a first-step procedure in the algorithm of male subfertility treatment.

Authors:  W Ombelet; P Puttemans; E Bosmans
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  The relationship between total motile sperm count and the success of intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  J G Brasch; R Rawlins; S Tarchala; E Radwanska
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Effect of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  S J DiMarzo; J F Kennedy; P E Young; S A Hebert; D C Rosenberg; B Villanueva
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Intrauterine insemination: evaluation of the results according to the woman's age, sperm quality, total sperm count per insemination and life table analysis.

Authors:  A Campana; D Sakkas; A Stalberg; P G Bianchi; I Comte; T Pache; D Walker
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Positive myeloperoxidase staining (Endtz test) as an indicator of excessive reactive oxygen species formation in semen.

Authors:  M Shekarriz; R K Sharma; A J Thomas; A Agarwal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  The impact of the total motile sperm count on the success of intrauterine insemination with husband's spermatozoa.

Authors:  H Y Huang; C L Lee; Y M Lai; M Y Chang; H S Wang; S Y Chang; Y K Soong
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Intrauterine insemination after ovarian stimulation as a treatment for subfertility because of subnormal semen: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  P C Ho; W K So; Y F Chan; W S Yeung
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  The influence of sperm morphology and the number of motile sperm inseminated on the outcome of intrauterine insemination combined with mild ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  R W Burr; R Siegberg; S P Flaherty; X J Wang; C D Matthews
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Pentoxifylline-supplemented cryoprotectant improves human sperm motility after cryopreservation.

Authors:  A P Brennan; C A Holden
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  5 in total

1.  Factors Leading to Pregnancies in Stimulated Intrauterine Insemination Cycles and the Use of Consecutive Ejaculations Within a Small Clinic Environment.

Authors:  Gulam Bahadur; Ofran Almossawi; Afeeza IIlahibuccus; Ansam Al-Habib; Stanley Okolo
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-05-20

2.  Mesenchymal stem cells restore the sperm motility from testicular torsion-detorsion injury by regulation of glucose metabolism in sperm.

Authors:  Chi-Hao Hsiao; Andrea Tung-Qian Ji; Chih-Cheng Chang; Ming-Hsien Chien; Liang-Ming Lee; Jennifer Hui-Chun Ho
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 3.  Effects of nonoxynol-9 (N-9) on sperm functions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Murong Xu; Mingpeng Zhao; Raymond Hang Wun Li; Zhixiu Lin; Jacqueline Pui Wah Chung; Tin Chiu Li; Tin-Lap Lee; David Yiu Leung Chan
Journal:  Reprod Fertil       Date:  2022-02-21

4.  Efficacy of sperm motility after processing and incubation to predict pregnancy after intrauterine insemination in normospermic individuals.

Authors:  Lígia F P de Araújo; Edilberto de Araújo Filho; Cássio L Fácio; Márcia C O Bossoni; Ligiane A Machado-Paula; José E Corrente; Mário Cavagna; Paulo C S Matheus; Anaglória Pontes
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 5.211

5.  Do pregnancy rates differ with intra-uterine insemination when different combinations of semen analysis parameters are abnormal?

Authors:  Anita Kuriya; Chioma Agbo; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2018-03-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.