Literature DB >> 10530129

The effect of a deproteinized bovine bone mineral on bone regeneration around titanium dental implants.

C H Hämmerle1, G C Chiantella, T Karring, N P Lang.   

Abstract

The aim of the present experiment was to test the effect of a deproteinized bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) on guided bone regeneration (GBR) in dehiscence defects around implants. The first 2 molars and all premolars were extracted on both sides of the mandibles of 3 monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Three months later, 2 titanium plasma-coated cylindrical implants were placed in all quadrants of each monkey. During the surgical procedure, standardized dehiscence defects were produced buccally and lingually, measuring 2.5 mm in width and 3 mm in height. Four different experimental situations were created: 2 sites in each monkey were covered with an ePTFE membrane (M), 2 were filled with the graft material (DBBM), 2 were filled with the graft material and also covered with a membrane (M + DBBM), and 2 control sites were neither grafted nor covered (C). The flaps were sutured to allow for primary healing. Linear measurements of bone height and width were calculated on histological specimens obtained 6 months following surgery. In addition, values for bone density and for surface fraction of graft to new bone contact were measured. Vertical bone growth along the implant surface of 100% (SD 0%) for M + DBBM, 91% (SD 9%) for M, 52% (SD 24%) for DBBM, and 42% (SD 35%) for C was measured. The width of the regenerated bone 1.5 mm above the bottom of the original defect, i.e. at the 50% mark of the vertical extension of the defect, in relation to the width at the bottom of the defect amounted to 97% (SD 2%) for M + DBBM, 85% (SD 9%) for M, 42% (SD 41%) for DBBM, and 23% (SD 31%) for C. Assessment of bone density within the confinement of the regenerated bone resulted in an increase of 30% (SD 11%) for M + DBBM, 45% (SD 20%) for M, 33% (SD 20%) for DBBM, and 22% (SD 23%) for C. The values for graft to new bone contact within this compartment amounted to 80% (SD 15%) for M + DBBM and 89% (SD 14%) for DBBM. In conclusion, Bio-Oss exhibited osteoconductive properties and hence can be recommended for GBR procedures in dehiscence defects with respect to vertical and horizontal growth of bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10530129     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090302.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  20 in total

1.  Effect of low-level laser therapy irradiation and Bio-Oss graft material on the osteogenesis process in rabbit calvarium defects: a double blind experimental study.

Authors:  Amir Alireza Rasouli Ghahroudi; Amir Reza Rokn; Katayoun A M Kalhori; Afshin Khorsand; Alireza Pournabi; A L B Pinheiro; Reza Fekrazad
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 2.  Collagen based barrier membranes for periodontal guided bone regeneration applications.

Authors:  Zeeshan Sheikh; Javairia Qureshi; Abdullah M Alshahrani; Heba Nassar; Yuichi Ikeda; Michael Glogauer; Bernhard Ganss
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  The use of bovine screws to promote bone formation using a tibia model in dogs.

Authors:  Marco Aurélio Bianchini; Marco Antônio B Pontual; Leonardo Bez; César Augusto M Benfatti; Fernanda Boabaid; Martha J Somerman; Ricardo S Magini
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2012-04-10

4.  Osteogenesis induced by autologous bone marrow cells transplant in the pediatric skull.

Authors:  Francesco Velardi; Paolina R Amante; Maurizio Caniglia; Giulio De Rossi; Pierpaolo Gaglini; Giancarlo Isacchi; Paolo Palma; Emidio Procaccini; Francesco Zinno
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  Bone augmentation with TiMesh. autologous bone versus autologous bone and bone substitutes. A systematic review.

Authors:  Fabrizio Carini; Salvatore Longoni; Ernesto Amosso; Jacopo Paleari; Stefania Carini; Gianluca Porcaro
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2014-10-25

6.  Periodontal regenerative effect of a bovine hydroxyapatite/collagen block in one-wall intrabony defects in dogs: a histometric analysis.

Authors:  Ui-Won Jung; Jung-Seok Lee; Weon-Yeong Park; Jae-Kook Cha; Ji-Wan Hwang; Jung-Chul Park; Chang-Sung Kim; Kyoo-Sung Cho; Jung-Kiu Chai; Seong-Ho Choi
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 2.614

7.  Comparison of osteogenic differentiation potential of human adult stem cells loaded on bioceramic-coated electrospun poly (L-lactide) nanofibres.

Authors:  A Ardeshirylajimi; M Mossahebi-Mohammadi; S Vakilian; L Langroudi; E Seyedjafari; A Atashi; M Soleimani
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 6.831

8.  Reconstructive periodontal therapy with simultaneous ridge augmentation. A clinical and histological case series report.

Authors:  Péter Windisch; Dóra Szendroi-Kiss; Attila Horváth; Zsuzsanna Suba; István Gera; Anton Sculean
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Histological examination of bone regeneration achieved by combining grafting with hydroxyapatite and thermoplastic bioresorbable plates.

Authors:  Taku Kojima; Norio Amizuka; Akiko Suzuki; Paulo Henrique Luiz de Freitas; Michiko Yoshizawa; Akira Kudo; Chikara Saito; Takeyasu Maeda
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Guided bone regeneration produced by new mineralized and reticulated collagen membranes in critical-sized rat calvarial defects.

Authors:  Denusa M Veríssimo; Renata F C Leitão; Sônia D Figueiró; Júlio C Góes; Vilma Lima; Charles O Silveira; Gerly A C Brito
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2014-09-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.