AIMS: To assess long-term functional morbidity in patients entered in the prospective randomized EORTC trial investigating the role of adjuvant isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with melphalan for high-risk primary melanoma. METHODS: In 65 patients (ILP 36, wide excision only 29), limb circumference and joint mobility measurements were performed on the treated and the contralateral limb after a mean interval of 48 months after primary treatment. The two treatment groups were comparable regarding age, sex distribution, percentage of skin grafts or regional lymph-node dissections, and interval between primary treatment and physical measurements. RESULTS: None of the patients had severe complaints of the treated limb at the time of analysis. The ankle suffered most from ILP, with a statistical significant restricted extension in approximately 40% of the perfused patients. Abduction of the shoulder was minimally affected in treated upper limbs, probably as a result from the formation of scar tissue after axillary lymph-node dissection. Although no significant differences could be demonstrated in the circumference of upper or lower limbs, atrophy was seen in 24% of perfused lower limbs. Of the five perfused patients who developed oedema, four had also undergone a regional lymph-node dissection. CONCLUSION: This risk of long-term functional morbidity should be weighed against the possible advantages of ILP in patients with limb melanoma or sarcoma.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To assess long-term functional morbidity in patients entered in the prospective randomized EORTC trial investigating the role of adjuvant isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with melphalan for high-risk primary melanoma. METHODS: In 65 patients (ILP 36, wide excision only 29), limb circumference and joint mobility measurements were performed on the treated and the contralateral limb after a mean interval of 48 months after primary treatment. The two treatment groups were comparable regarding age, sex distribution, percentage of skin grafts or regional lymph-node dissections, and interval between primary treatment and physical measurements. RESULTS: None of the patients had severe complaints of the treated limb at the time of analysis. The ankle suffered most from ILP, with a statistical significant restricted extension in approximately 40% of the perfused patients. Abduction of the shoulder was minimally affected in treated upper limbs, probably as a result from the formation of scar tissue after axillary lymph-node dissection. Although no significant differences could be demonstrated in the circumference of upper or lower limbs, atrophy was seen in 24% of perfused lower limbs. Of the five perfused patients who developed oedema, four had also undergone a regional lymph-node dissection. CONCLUSION: This risk of long-term functional morbidity should be weighed against the possible advantages of ILP in patients with limb melanoma or sarcoma.
Authors: Jan P Deroose; Jacobus W A Burger; Albertus N van Geel; Michael A den Bakker; Johannes S de Jong; Alexander M M Eggermont; Cornelis Verhoef Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2010-11-04 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Miriam L Hoven-Gondrie; Katja M J Thijssens; Jan H B Geertzen; Elisabeth Pras; Robert J van Ginkel; Harald J Hoekstra Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2008-03-11 Impact factor: 5.344