Literature DB >> 10528005

Preliminary experience of the use of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist in ovulation induction/in-vitro fertilization prior to cancer treatment.

R A Anderson1, D Kinniburgh, D T Baird.   

Abstract

Therapeutic regimens for the treatment of malignant disease may compromise future fertility. One approach to circumvent this is the cryopreservation of embryos created before treatment for the malignancy. Conventional regimens using gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists are time consuming, requiring pituitary down-regulation before gonadotrophin administration, thus the duration of treatment is approximately 20-30 days. GnRH antagonists, however, do not cause an initial stimulation of gonadotrophin secretion and can thus be administered during the later stages of follicular maturation to prevent premature luteinization and ovulation. The duration of ovulation induction/in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment is thus reduced. In this study, case histories are reported of six women with newly diagnosed malignancies who requested ovulation induction/IVF prior to chemotherapy or surgery in which we have used the GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix. Gonadotrophin administration was started in the early follicular phase, and Cetrorelix (0.25 mg s.c. daily) was added from day 6 of treatment. Subsequent to human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration oocytes were recovered and successful fertilization and embryo cryopreservation was achieved in all cases. The median duration of treatment was 12 days (range 8-13, including induction of luteolysis in two patients). These results illustrate the potential use and advantages of a GnRH antagonist in ovulation induction/IVF when the need for immediate initiation of treatment and its duration are critical factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10528005     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.10.2665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  9 in total

Review 1.  Ovarian stimulation during the luteal phase for fertility preservation of cancer patients: case reports and review of the literature.

Authors:  Giuliano M Bedoschi; Felipe Oliveira de Albuquerque; Rui Alberto Ferriani; Paula Andrea Navarro
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  IVF for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients--efficacy and safety issues.

Authors:  M Shapira; H Raanani; D Meirow
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Ovarian stimulation for emergency fertility preservation in cancer patients: A case series study.

Authors:  Batool Hossein Rashidi; Ensiyeh Shahrokh Tehrani; Firouzeh Ghaffari
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-10-01

4.  Ovarian tissue cryopreservation followed by controlled ovarian stimulation and pick-up of mature oocytes does not impair the number or quality of retrieved oocytes.

Authors:  Marie-Madeleine Dolmans; Maria-Laura Marotta; Céline Pirard; Jacques Donnez; Olivier Donnez
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.234

5.  Luteal phase stimulation versus follicular phase stimulation in poor ovarian responders: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Joaquín Llácer; Belén Moliner; Lydia Luque; Andrea Bernabéu; Belén Lledó; Juan Carlos Castillo; Jaime Guerrero; Jorge Ten; Rafael Bernabéu
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Oocyte and embryo cryopreservation before gonadotoxic treatments: Principles of safe ovarian stimulation, a systematic review.

Authors:  Meghan Ch Ozcan; Victoria Snegovskikh; G David Adamson
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

7.  Random Start Ovarian Stimulation.

Authors:  Pratap Kumar; Shubha Rao; Anjali Mundkur; Prashanth Adiga; Vidyashree G Poojari; Rashmi K Ullagaddi
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-06-30

Review 8.  Fertility Preservation: A Key Survivorship Issue for Young Women with Cancer.

Authors:  Ana Milena Angarita; Cynae A Johnson; Amanda Nickles Fader; Mindy S Christianson
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Random-start controlled ovarian stimulation for emergency fertility preservation in a patient with myelodysplastic syndrome: a case report.

Authors:  H Cai; H Shen
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.590

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.