Literature DB >> 10527815

The Directionality of Verbal Probability Expressions: Effects on Decisions, Predictions, and Probabilistic Reasoning.

.   

Abstract

Verbal phrases denoting uncertainty are of two kinds: positive, suggesting the occurrence of a target outcome, and negative, drawing attention to its nonoccurrence (Teigen & Brun, 1995). This directionality is correlated with, but not identical to, high and low p values. Choice of phrase will in turn influence predictions and decisions. A treatment described as having "some possibility" of success will be recommended, as opposed to when it is described as "quite uncertain," even if the probability of cure referred to by these two expressions is judged to be the same (Experiment 1). Individuals who formulate their chances of achieving a successful outcome in positive terms are supposed to make different decisions than individuals who use equivalent, but negatively formulated, phrases (Experiments 2 and 3). Finally, negative phrases lead to fewer conjunction errors in probabilistic reasoning than do positive phrases (Experiment 4). For instance, a combination of 2 "uncertain" outcomes is readily seen to be "very uncertain." But positive phrases lead to fewer disjunction errors than do negative phrases. Thus verbal probabilistic phrases differ from numerical probabilities not primarily by being more "vague," but by suggesting more clearly the kind of inferences that should be drawn. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Year:  1999        PMID: 10527815     DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process        ISSN: 0749-5978


  6 in total

1.  The interpretation of phrases used to describe uncertainty in pathology reports.

Authors:  Malcolm Galloway; Taj Taiyeb
Journal:  Patholog Res Int       Date:  2011-08-14

2.  Probability expression for changeable and changeless uncertainties: an implicit test.

Authors:  Yun Wang; Xue-Lei Du; Li-Lin Rao; Shu Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-13

3.  Verbal probabilities: Very likely to be somewhat more confusing than numbers.

Authors:  Bonnie C Wintle; Hannah Fraser; Ben C Wills; Ann E Nicholson; Fiona Fidler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Verbal Descriptions Accompanying Numeric Information About the Risk: The Valence of Message and Linguistic Polarity.

Authors:  Agnieszka Olchowska-Kotala
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2019-12

5.  ERP Correlates of Verbal and Numerical Probabilities in Risky Choices: A Two-Stage Probability Processing View.

Authors:  Shu Li; Xue-Lei Du; Qi Li; Yan-Hua Xuan; Yun Wang; Li-Lin Rao
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 6.  Juror comprehension of forensic expert testimony: A literature review and gap analysis.

Authors:  Heidi Eldridge
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 2.395

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.