Literature DB >> 10527372

Influence of segmental and extra-segmental conditioning, stimuli on cortical potentials evoked by painful electrical stimulation.

I Watanabe1, P Svensson, L Arendt-Nielsen.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of two different types of segmental/extra-segmental conditioning stimuli (tonic muscle pain and non-painful vibration) on the subjective experience (perceived pain intensity) and on the cortical evoked potentials to standardized test stimuli (cutaneous electrical stimuli). Twelve subjects participated in two separate sessions to investigate the effects of tonic muscle pain or cutaneous vibration on experimental test stimuli. The experimental protocol contained a baseline registration (test stimuli only), a registration with the test stimuli in combination with the conditioning stimuli, followed by a registration with the test stimuli only. In addition, the effects of the conditioning stimuli were examined at two anatomically separated locations (segmental and extra-segmental). Compared with the test stimulus alone, the perceived pain intensity and peak-to-peak amplitudes of the evoked potentials were unchanged in the presence of non-painful conditioning stimuli at either location. In contrast, a significant decrease of the perceived pain intensity and peak-to-peak amplitudes was found in the presence of painful conditioning stimuli at the extra-segmental sites. Moreover, the topographic maps of the 32-channel recordings suggested that the distribution of the scalp evoked potentials was almost symmetrical around the vertex Cz in the baseline registration. The evoked potentials were generally decreased during hypertonic saline infusion at the extra-segmental sites, but the distribution of the topographic maps did not appear to change. Vibration has previously been shown to inhibit pain, but in the present study the perceived intensity of phasic painful electrical stimuli was unchanged. The reduced perceived pain intensity and the smaller peak-to-peak amplitude of the evoked potential in the presence of extra-segmental conditioning pain are in accordance with the concept of diffuse noxious inhibitory control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10527372     DOI: 10.1080/08990229970492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res        ISSN: 0899-0220            Impact factor:   1.111


  6 in total

Review 1.  The role of sensory fiber demography in trigeminal and postherpetic neuralgias.

Authors:  A F DaSilva; M F DosSantos
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  An inhibitory interaction of human cortical responses to stimuli preferentially exciting Adelta or C fibers.

Authors:  T D Tran; D Matre; K L Casey
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Thermonociceptive interaction: interchannel pain modulation occurs before intrachannel convergence of warmth.

Authors:  Antonio Cataldo; Elisa Raffaella Ferrè; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Vibratory stimulation increase the electro-cutaneous sensory detection and pain thresholds in women but not in men.

Authors:  Lisbeth Dahlin; Irene Lund; Thomas Lundeberg; Carl Molander
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 3.659

5.  Touch inhibits touch: sanshool-induced paradoxical tingling reveals perceptual interaction between somatosensory submodalities.

Authors:  Antonio Cataldo; Nobuhiro Hagura; Yousef Hyder; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Pain relief by touch: a quantitative approach.

Authors:  Flavia Mancini; Thomas Nash; Gian Domenico Iannetti; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 6.961

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.