Literature DB >> 10527314

Ventilatory responses during experimental cycle-run transition in triathletes.

O Hue1, D Le Gallais, A Boussana, D Chollet, C Prefaut.   

Abstract

PURPOSE AND METHODS: To determine the effects of cycling on a subsequent triathlon run, nine male triathletes underwent four successive laboratory trials: 1) an incremental treadmill test, 2) an incremental cycle test, 3) 30 min of cycling followed by 5 km of running (C-R), and 4) 30 min of running followed by 5 km of running (R-R). Before and 10 min after the third and fourth trials, the triathletes underwent pulmonary function testing including spirometry and diffusing capacity testing for carbon monoxide (DL(CO)). During the C-R and R-R trials, arterialized blood samples were obtained to measure arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2). During all trials, ventilatory data were collected every minute using an automated breath-by-breath system.
RESULTS: The results showed that 1) the oxygen uptake (VO2) observed during subsequent running was similar for the C-R and R-R trials; 2) the ventilatory response (VE) during the first 8 min of subsequent running was significantly greater in the C-R than in R-R trial (P < 0.05); 3) only the C-R trial induced a significant increase (P < 0.05) in residual volume (RV), functional residual capacity (FRC), and the ratio of residual volume to total lung capacity (RV/TLC); and 4) although a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in DL(CO) was noted after C-R, no difference between the two exercise trials was found for the maximal drop in PaO2.
CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that 1) the C-R trial induced specific alterations in pulmonary function that may be associated with respiratory muscle fatigue and/or exercise-induced hypoxemia, and 2) the greater VE observed during the first minute of running after cycling was due to the specificity of cycling. This reinforces the necessity for triathletes to practice multi-trial training to stimulate the physiological responses experienced during the swim-cycle and the cycle-run transitions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10527314     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199910000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  6 in total

Review 1.  Factors affecting performance in an ultraendurance triathlon.

Authors:  P B Laursen; E C Rhodes
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Comparison of running and cycling economy in runners, cyclists, and triathletes.

Authors:  Wannes Swinnen; Shalaya Kipp; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Combined cycle and run performance is maximised when the cycle is completed at the highest sustainable intensity.

Authors:  Robert Suriano; David Bishop
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Physiological differences between cycling and running: lessons from triathletes.

Authors:  Gregoire P Millet; V E Vleck; D J Bentley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Triathlon wetsuit removal strategy: physiological cost of running with a wetsuit.

Authors:  Mihaela Ciulei; Aaron Prado; James Navalta; John A Mercer
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 2.193

6.  Impact of Seated and Standing Bicycle Riding Position on Subsequent Running Performance.

Authors:  Randall L Jensen; Brendon J Ewers; Brian Cunniffe; Brian Phelan; Andrew J Harrison; Amir Shafat
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2008-10-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.