OBJECTIVE: To examine the concurrent validity of a newly developed telephone adaptation of the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam. BACKGROUND: Longitudinal studies of cognition may be advantaged by availability of assessment instruments that can be used over the telephone, as well as in person. METHOD: Subjects were 263 noninstitutionalized elderly residents of a rural community in southern Idaho, aged 65 to 93, who had little or no cognitive difficulty. At an average interval of four weeks, we administered the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS) and the newly adapted Telephone Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (T3MS). Order of administration was randomly assigned. RESULTS: Agreement between scores on the two instruments was good (r = 0.82, p < 0.001). When we applied various cutoff scores to the instruments, thereby generating assignments of individuals to "screen positive" and "screen negative" groups, the percent agreement in screening results ranged from 80% to 96% as we reduced the cutoff scores from 90 to 74 (100 points possible). CONCLUSIONS: At least among subjects without major cognitive syndromes, the Telephone Modified Mini-Mental State Exam provides a reasonable substitute for the more costly in-person 3MS. The telephone instrument should now be tested over a broader range of cognitive abilities in order to assess its validity in more impaired subjects, e.g., by studying an institutionalized sample.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the concurrent validity of a newly developed telephone adaptation of the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam. BACKGROUND: Longitudinal studies of cognition may be advantaged by availability of assessment instruments that can be used over the telephone, as well as in person. METHOD: Subjects were 263 noninstitutionalized elderly residents of a rural community in southern Idaho, aged 65 to 93, who had little or no cognitive difficulty. At an average interval of four weeks, we administered the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS) and the newly adapted Telephone Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (T3MS). Order of administration was randomly assigned. RESULTS: Agreement between scores on the two instruments was good (r = 0.82, p < 0.001). When we applied various cutoff scores to the instruments, thereby generating assignments of individuals to "screen positive" and "screen negative" groups, the percent agreement in screening results ranged from 80% to 96% as we reduced the cutoff scores from 90 to 74 (100 points possible). CONCLUSIONS: At least among subjects without major cognitive syndromes, the Telephone Modified Mini-Mental State Exam provides a reasonable substitute for the more costly in-person 3MS. The telephone instrument should now be tested over a broader range of cognitive abilities in order to assess its validity in more impaired subjects, e.g., by studying an institutionalized sample.
Authors: Karen T Cuenco; Robert C Green; J Zhang; Kathryn Lunetta; Porat M Erlich; L Adrienne Cupples; Lindsay A Farrer; Charles DeCarli Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Y H W Tsui-Caldwell; T J Farrer; Z McDonnell; Z Christensen; C Finuf; E D Bigler; J T Tschanz; M C Norton; K A Welsh-Bohmer Journal: J Prev Alzheimers Dis Date: 2019
Authors: Laura A Rabin; Andrew J Saykin; Heather A Wishart; Katherine E Nutter-Upham; Laura A Flashman; Nadia Pare; Robert B Santulli Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Michael J Skrajner; Cameron J Camp; Jessica L Haberman; Timothy G Heckman; Arlene Kochman; Cristina Frentiu Journal: HIV AIDS (Auckl) Date: 2009-11-01
Authors: Teresa C Castanho; Liliana Amorim; Joseph Zihl; Joana A Palha; Nuno Sousa; Nadine C Santos Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 5.750
Authors: Anne R Carlew; Hudaisa Fatima; Julia R Livingstone; Caitlin Reese; Laura Lacritz; Cody Pendergrass; Kenneth Chase Bailey; Chase Presley; Ben Mokhtari; Colin Munro Cullum Journal: Arch Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2020-11-19 Impact factor: 2.813