M A Rosenblatt1, S A Schartel. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA. Meg_Rosenblatt@smtplink.mssm.edu
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To provide a review of evaluation, feedback, and remediation methods in United States residency programs during 1995 to 1996. The information gathered is to serve as a framework for discussions within and among programs regarding ways to enhance their current processes of evaluation, feedback, and remediation, and to serve as a baseline for future assessments. DESIGN, SETTING AND SUBJECTS: A three-page survey was mailed to program directors of each of the 145 anesthesiology programs listed in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME/NRMP) Directory. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Quantitative and qualitative responses were sought about the resident evaluation process (including techniques of gathering information, frequency of evaluations, faculty compliance, and modes of offering feedback), departmental clinical competence committee, probation and remediation policies for problem residents, and the use of formal examinations. There was an 85.5% response rate. Frequency of evaluation of residents ranged from daily to quarterly: evaluations used both narrative comments and rating scales in 89% of institutions. Faculty compliance in the evaluation process was greater than 75% in 45.1% of programs. Only 25 (20.2%) programs offered formal training about resident evaluation to their faculty. Clinical competence committee meetings averaged five times annually. Ninety-five percent of committees were chaired by someone other than the department chairperson and 27% had resident members. A written policy regarding problem residents was used by 67.7% of programs, a formal probation policy by 82.2%. Standardized tests to provide feedback and guidance to residents existed in 48.3% of programs. CONCLUSIONS: There is a tremendous variety of techniques and methodologies employed among anesthesiology residency programs with regard to evaluation, feedback, and remediation, within the framework of the ACGME guidelines. Faculty training in the assessment of and feedback to residents is one area in which many programs can begin to strengthen their current procedures.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To provide a review of evaluation, feedback, and remediation methods in United States residency programs during 1995 to 1996. The information gathered is to serve as a framework for discussions within and among programs regarding ways to enhance their current processes of evaluation, feedback, and remediation, and to serve as a baseline for future assessments. DESIGN, SETTING AND SUBJECTS: A three-page survey was mailed to program directors of each of the 145 anesthesiology programs listed in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME/NRMP) Directory. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Quantitative and qualitative responses were sought about the resident evaluation process (including techniques of gathering information, frequency of evaluations, faculty compliance, and modes of offering feedback), departmental clinical competence committee, probation and remediation policies for problem residents, and the use of formal examinations. There was an 85.5% response rate. Frequency of evaluation of residents ranged from daily to quarterly: evaluations used both narrative comments and rating scales in 89% of institutions. Faculty compliance in the evaluation process was greater than 75% in 45.1% of programs. Only 25 (20.2%) programs offered formal training about resident evaluation to their faculty. Clinical competence committee meetings averaged five times annually. Ninety-five percent of committees were chaired by someone other than the department chairperson and 27% had resident members. A written policy regarding problem residents was used by 67.7% of programs, a formal probation policy by 82.2%. Standardized tests to provide feedback and guidance to residents existed in 48.3% of programs. CONCLUSIONS: There is a tremendous variety of techniques and methodologies employed among anesthesiology residency programs with regard to evaluation, feedback, and remediation, within the framework of the ACGME guidelines. Faculty training in the assessment of and feedback to residents is one area in which many programs can begin to strengthen their current procedures.
Authors: Judi A Turner; Michael G Fitzsimons; Manuel C Pardo; Joy L Hawkins; Yue Ming Huang; Maria D D Rudolph; Mary A Keyes; Kimberly J Howard-Quijano; Natale Z Naim; Jack C Buckley; Tristan R Grogan; Randolph H Steadman Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Mette K Christensen; Lotte O'Neill; Dorthe H Hansen; Karen Norberg; Lene S Mortensen; Peder Charles Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Ronald E Domen; Michael L Talbert; Kristen Johnson; Miriam D Post; Mark D Brissette; Richard Michael Conran; Robert D Hoffman; Cindy B McCloskey; Patricia M Raciti; Cory Anthony Roberts; Amyn M Rojiani; J Allan Tucker; Suzanne Zein-Eldin Powell Journal: Acad Pathol Date: 2015-07-06