Literature DB >> 10526431

Women's approaches to decision making about mammography.

M L Lewis1, S A Corcoran-Perry, S M Narayan, R M Lally.   

Abstract

Health professionals have an obligation to understand women's decision making about mammography and to advocate for their active participation in health care decision making. Although mammography is a major screening measure for the second largest cancer killer of women, only approximately half of women older than age 50 years, and fewer older than age 70 years, undergo mammography in accordance with American Cancer Society (ACS) guidelines. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify women's overall decision-making approaches when considering mammography. Subjects were a purposive, convenience sample of 50 women in the community who had made a decision about mammography; they included those who chose to have mammograms and those who decided not to have mammograms according to the pre-1997 ACS guidelines. Subjects participated in audiotaped interviews. Results indicated that women approached the mammography decision differently, regardless of the decision they made. Three overall decision-making approaches to addressing risk factors, issues about mammography, or other factors before their decision were evident. The approaches were (1) thoughtful consideration; (2) cursory consideration; and (3) little or no consideration. Each approach has implications for nurses who assist women in making decisions about mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10526431     DOI: 10.1097/00002820-199910000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Nurs        ISSN: 0162-220X            Impact factor:   2.592


  3 in total

1.  Decision making and counseling around mammography screening for women aged 80 or older.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Radhika A Ramanan; Ellen P McCarthy; Edward R Marcantonio
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Communicating with women about mammography.

Authors:  Berta M Geller; Jane Zapka; Solveig S-H Hofvind; Astrid Scharpantgen; Livia Giordano; Noriaki Ohuchi; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Staging mammography nonadherent women: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Nancy LaPelle; Mary E Costanza; Roger Luckmann; Milagros C Rosal; Mary Jo White; Jennifer Rider Stark
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.771

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.