Literature DB >> 10526190

A prospective study on the natural history of multiple sclerosis: clues to the conduct and interpretation of clinical trials.

M P Amato1, G Ponziani, M L Bartolozzi, G Siracusa.   

Abstract

The study's objectives were to assess the predictive significance of different sets of demographic, clinical and extraclinical variables in identifying multiple sclerosis patients with various risk levels of worsening during the follow-up, in order to provide clues to inclusion criteria and selection of primary clinical end-points in therapeutic trials. Two hundred and twenty-four patients at their first diagnosis of multiple sclerosis admitted to our Department between 1983 and 1990 were prospectively followed-up until the end of 1996. We considered as end-points time to reach non-reversible disability levels corresponding to EDSS scores of 4.0 and 6.0 and the beginning of a secondary progressive phase in the relapsing-remitting subgroup of patients. For the statistical treatment of our data we used the Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the Cox regression analysis. An initially progressive course and higher basal EDSS scores proved to be the best predictors of unfavorable prognosis; a greater number of functional systems involved at onset as well as higher residual deficits in pyramidal, visual, sphincteric and cerebellar systems were other factors predictive of a poor outcome, whereas sensory system involvement turned out to be favorable. In the relapsing-remitting subgroup, a longer first inter-attack interval was associated with a better prognosis; however, overall number of relapses in the first two years of the disease was of no prognostic value. The presence of oligoclonal banding in the cerebrospinal fluid and a cerebral MRI 'strongly suggestive' or 'suggestive' of MS in the early phases of the disease were associated with a higher probability of a worse outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10526190     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-510x(99)00143-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  19 in total

1.  Compensatory cortical activation observed by fMRI during a cognitive task at the earliest stage of MS.

Authors:  Bertrand Audoin; Danielle Ibarrola; Jean-Philippe Ranjeva; Sylviane Confort-Gouny; Irina Malikova; André Ali-Chérif; Jean Pelletier; Patrick Cozzone
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Magnetic resonance study of the influence of tissue damage and cortical reorganization on PASAT performance at the earliest stage of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Bertrand Audoin; My Van Au Duong; Jean-Philippe Ranjeva; Danielle Ibarrola; Irina Malikova; Sylviane Confort-Gouny; Elisabeth Soulier; Patrick Viout; André Ali-Chérif; Jean Pelletier; Patrick J Cozzone
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Benign multiple sclerosis: does it exist?

Authors:  Jorge Correale; María C Ysrraelit; Marcela P Fiol
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 4.  Multiple sclerosis in the elderly patient.

Authors:  Amer Awad; Olaf Stüve
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Clinical prognostic factors in multiple sclerosis: a natural history review.

Authors:  Alexandra Degenhardt; Sreeram V Ramagopalan; Antonio Scalfari; George C Ebers
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 6.  Aggressive multiple sclerosis: proposed definition and treatment algorithm.

Authors:  Carolina A Rush; Heather J MacLean; Mark S Freedman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 7.  The utility of cerebrospinal fluid analysis in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Martin Stangel; Sten Fredrikson; Edgar Meinl; Axel Petzold; Olaf Stüve; Hayrettin Tumani
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 8.  [Prognostic and predictively relevant factors for multiple sclerosis].

Authors:  B Tackenberg; T Schneider-Hohendorf; A Müller; J Schodrowski; H Wiendl
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 9.  What We Learned from The History of Multiple Sclerosis Measurement: Expanded Disability Status Scale.

Authors:  Bilge Piri Çinar; Yüksel Güven Yorgun
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.339

10.  Clinical predictors of early second event in patients with clinically isolated syndrome.

Authors:  Ellen M Mowry; Mila Pesic; Barbara Grimes; Serina R Deen; Peter Bacchetti; Emmanuelle Waubant
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.