C Hollinsky1, S Göbl. 1. Kaiserin Elisabeth Hospital, Surgical Department, Huglg. 1-3, A-1150 Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy, meshes commonly have been fixed with a stapler. Recently, a new mode of fixation using a helical fastener has been introduced. The purpose of this experimental study was to compare the stability achieved by various types of mesh fixation. METHODS: In 20 human cadavers, polypropylene meshes 10 x 15 cm in size were fixed in both groins by using either a helical fastener or a hernia stapler (4.8 mm). The mesh was fixed with 2, 4, and 8 elements and stressed with a dynamometer until the prosthesis ruptured. A paired and two-sided Student's t-test was used for statistical evaluation. RESULTS: With the helical fastener, the mesh could be fixed always at the desired site. However, with the stapler, it was not possible to fix the mesh in the pubic bone or, at times, in the Cooper's ligament. When two fixation elements were used, the mesh fixed by the helical fastener was able to withstand a median load of 34 N (range 23-53 N), and that fixed by the stapler 7.5 N (range 3-12 N; p < 0.001). When four fixation elements were used, the mesh fixed by the helical fastener was able to withstand 70.5 N (range 53-80 N) and that fixed by the stapler 17. 5 N (range 4-25 N; p < 0.001). With the use of eight elements, the mesh fixed by the helical fastener withstood 127 N (range 84-156 N) and that fixed by the stapler 32.5 N (range 15-59 N; p < 0.001). Thus, in all cases the helical fastener was significantly more stress resistant. The main reason for detachment of the mesh was tissue disruption or deformation of the fixation elements. Only when a stress of more than 130 N was applied did the mesh tear in two cases. CONCLUSIONS: The stress-bearing capacity (shear force resistance) of a mesh fixed by a helical fastener is up to four times that of a mesh fixed by a stapler. Therefore, the helical fastener provides significantly more stable fixation and will be able to protect the patient better from recurrent hernias caused by mesh migration.
BACKGROUND: In laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy, meshes commonly have been fixed with a stapler. Recently, a new mode of fixation using a helical fastener has been introduced. The purpose of this experimental study was to compare the stability achieved by various types of mesh fixation. METHODS: In 20 human cadavers, polypropylene meshes 10 x 15 cm in size were fixed in both groins by using either a helical fastener or a hernia stapler (4.8 mm). The mesh was fixed with 2, 4, and 8 elements and stressed with a dynamometer until the prosthesis ruptured. A paired and two-sided Student's t-test was used for statistical evaluation. RESULTS: With the helical fastener, the mesh could be fixed always at the desired site. However, with the stapler, it was not possible to fix the mesh in the pubic bone or, at times, in the Cooper's ligament. When two fixation elements were used, the mesh fixed by the helical fastener was able to withstand a median load of 34 N (range 23-53 N), and that fixed by the stapler 7.5 N (range 3-12 N; p < 0.001). When four fixation elements were used, the mesh fixed by the helical fastener was able to withstand 70.5 N (range 53-80 N) and that fixed by the stapler 17. 5 N (range 4-25 N; p < 0.001). With the use of eight elements, the mesh fixed by the helical fastener withstood 127 N (range 84-156 N) and that fixed by the stapler 32.5 N (range 15-59 N; p < 0.001). Thus, in all cases the helical fastener was significantly more stress resistant. The main reason for detachment of the mesh was tissue disruption or deformation of the fixation elements. Only when a stress of more than 130 N was applied did the mesh tear in two cases. CONCLUSIONS: The stress-bearing capacity (shear force resistance) of a mesh fixed by a helical fastener is up to four times that of a mesh fixed by a stapler. Therefore, the helical fastener provides significantly more stable fixation and will be able to protect the patient better from recurrent hernias caused by mesh migration.
Authors: Bernhard J Leibl; Barbara Kraft; Jens Daniel Redecke; Claus Georg Schmedt; Martin Ulrich; Klaus Kraft; Reinhard Bittner Journal: World J Surg Date: 2002-09-26 Impact factor: 3.352