| Literature DB >> 10525767 |
R Mäntylä1, H J Aronen, O Salonen, M Korpelainen, T Peltonen, C Standertskjöld-Nordenstam, T Erkinjuntti.
Abstract
No uniform criteria currently exist for rating white-matter (WM) high-signal foci on MRI. Ratings are based on descriptive terms, different pulse sequences and different WM areas. Reports on the prevalence and clinical correlates of high-signal foci have been contradictory. We wanted to examine the contribution of the pulse sequence and WM area on rating WM changes. We analysed WM changes separately on T2-, protondensity (PD)- and T1-weighted images in periventricular, subcortical, watershed area and deep WM. The difference between T2- and PD-weighted images was significant for frontal caps, counting small foci or analysing subcortical changes. T1-weighted images showed significantly less change, but the number of foci detected was greater than previously thought. The prevalence of WM high-signal foci was greatest in the watershed zone and smallest in the subcortical area. There was a significant correlation between foci in different areas.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1999 PMID: 10525767 DOI: 10.1007/s002340050820
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroradiology ISSN: 0028-3940 Impact factor: 2.804