Literature DB >> 10525712

Development and validation of the mini-osteoporosis quality of life questionnaire (OQLQ) in osteoporotic women with back pain due to vertebral fractures. Osteoporosis Quality of Life Study Group.

D J Cook1, G H Guyatt, J D Adachi, R S Epstein, E F Juniper, P A Austin, J Clifton, C J Rosen, C R Kessenich, J L Stock, J Overdorf, P D Miller, A L Erickson, M R McCLung, B L McClung, L E Griffith, G Ioannidis.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate a shortened osteoporosis quality of life questionnaire (OQLQ) in osteoporotic women with back pain due to vertebral fractures. From the longer 30-item OQLQ (four to nine items per domain) we created the mini-OQLQ by choosing the two items with the highest impact in each of five domains (symptoms, physical function, activities of daily living, emotional function, leisure). We administered the OQLQ, the Sickness Impact Profile, the SF-36 and the Brief Pain Index to patients at baseline, after 2 weeks and after 6 months. The intraclass correlations between baseline and the 2-week follow-up for the five mini-OQLQ domains ranged from 0.72 to 0.86. Cross-sectional correlations between the domains of the mini-OQLQ and other health instruments were moderate to large (0.35-0.80) and greater than predicted. The mini-OQLQ items showed moderate to large correlations with items omitted from the shortened questionnaire (0. 44-0.88). Correlations between the OQLQ domains and the other three instruments were greater than those of the mini-OQLQ, and partial correlations between OQLQ items omitted from the mini-OQLQ and the other three instruments after considering mini-OQLQ items were substantial (0.19-0.71) and statistically significant. Sample sizes of less than 200 per group should be required to detect minimally important differences in parallel-group clinical trials. Longitudinal correlations between the mini-OQLQ and the other measures were often significant but generally lower than predicted (0.10-0.49). The partial correlations revealed that the omitted items explained a significant portion of the longitudinal variance in each domain. We conclude that in a selected group of patients with back pain caused by vertebral fractures, the mini-OQLQ demonstrated good discriminative and adequate evaluative properties. The mini-questionnaire should be useful in clinical settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10525712     DOI: 10.1007/s001980050217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  26 in total

1.  Does an educational leaflet improve self-reported adherence to therapy in osteoporosis? The OPTIMA study.

Authors:  M Guilera; M Fuentes; M Grifols; J Ferrer; X Badia
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-12-31       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Validation of the Malay version of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41) in Malaysia.

Authors:  Thiagarajan Nagammai; Mohamed Mohazmi; Su May Liew; Karuthan Chinna; Pauline Siew Mei Lai
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Determinants of health-related quality of life in women with vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Alexandra Papaioannou; Courtney C Kennedy; George Ioannidis; Jacques P Brown; Anjali Pathak; David A Hanley; Robert G Josse; Rolf J Sebaldt; Wojciech P Olszynski; Alan Tenenhouse; Timothy M Murray; Annie Petrie; Charles H Goldsmith; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Validation of the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-26) in Korean population.

Authors:  Jung Sub Lee; Jong Ki Shin; Seung Min Son; Sung Jin An; Sung Shik Kang
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  The reliability and validity of the simplified Chinese version of Male QUALEFFO-26.

Authors:  Leilei Xu; Weixiang Sun; Xiaodong Qin; Xiufen Zhu; Yong Qiu; Zezhang Zhu
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 2.631

6.  Development and validation of a specific quality of life module in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis: the QUALIOST.

Authors:  P Marquis; P Cialdella; C De la Loge
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Build better bones with exercise: protocol for a feasibility study of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 12 months of home exercise in women with a vertebral fracture.

Authors:  Lora M Giangregorio; Lehana Thabane; Jonathan D Adachi; Maureen C Ashe; Robert R Bleakney; E Anne Braun; Angela M Cheung; Lisa-Ann Fraser; Jenna C Gibbs; Keith D Hill; Anthony B Hodsman; David L Kendler; Nicole Mittmann; Sadhana Prasad; Samuel C Scherer; John D Wark; Alexandra Papaioannou
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2014-05-01

8.  Quality-of-life assessment in osteoporosis: health-status and preference-based measures.

Authors:  Anna N A Tosteson; Cristina S Hammond
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  The impact of fragility fracture on health-related quality of life : the importance of antifracture therapy.

Authors:  Ted Xenodemetropoulos; Shawn Davison; George Ioannidis; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-31) in Chinese.

Authors:  Billy M H Lai; Shirley W Y Tsang; Cindy L K Lam; Annie W C Kung
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.