Literature DB >> 10525636

[Percutaneous interventional radiologic implantation of intravenous port-catheter systems].

K A Herrmann1, T Waggershauser, T Helmberger, V Heinemann, H Sittek, M Reiser.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Percutaneous interventional radiologic and surgical techniques of port-catheter implantation are described and compared with regard to the technical procedure and results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 53 patients with various malignancies interventional radiologic implantation of port-catheter systems into the subclavian vein was performed to provide long-term intravenous access for chemotherapy. The technical procedure, operation time, complication rates and long-term patency were compared with those of surgically implanted systems.
RESULTS: Implantation was successful in all cases. Mean operation time was 36 min (range 20-55 min). Mean function time was 189 days (range 7-518). Primary patency rate was 92.5% with a total complication rate of 15% (8/53). In three patients (5.7%) pneumothorax was observed but did not require further treatment. In two cases (3.8%) local infection occurred, and in one patient (1.8%) a non-complicated wound dehiscence. In 12/53 patients (22.6%) the system was withdrawn. Among these, withdrawal was due to complications in 4/53 (7.6%) cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Interventional radiologic implantation of long-term intravenous port-catheter systems is comparable to surgical placement with regard to both complication rate and long-term patency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10525636     DOI: 10.1007/s001170050575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  4 in total

1.  Retrospective outcome analysis of rates and types of complications after 8654 minimally invasive radiological port implantations via the subclavian vein without ultrasound guidance.

Authors:  Karolin J Paprottka; Jana Voelklein; Tobias Waggershauser; Maximilian F Reiser; Philipp M Paprottka
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  [How should urologists perform implantation of subcutaneous central venous port systems? A single center experience of 347 cases].

Authors:  M Schenck; W Michels-Oswald; S Tschirdewahn; H Rübben; F Vom Dorp; A Rose; A Panic; C Niedworok; R Rossi
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Frequent AV node reentrant tachycardia induced by oversized port catheter.

Authors:  Stefan Andreas Lange; Jens Jung
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Central venous port implantations via the cephalic vein applying an intravasal electrographic control of the catheter tip position: a single-center experience of 316 cases.

Authors:  Marcus Schenck; Tim Schneider; Herbert Rübben; Andreas Eisenhardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 4.226

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.