Literature DB >> 10525222

Risk predictors in patients scheduled for percutaneous coronary revascularization.

L Harrell1, H Schunkert, I F Palacios.   

Abstract

Traditionally, procedural risks associated with conventional balloon coronary angioplasty have been largely attributed to unfavorable lesion morphology. However, factors predicting adverse events in the current practice of percutaneous coronary revascularization are unclear. The present study was undertaken to determine factors predicting major adverse events (death or Q-wave myocardial infarction or emergency bypass surgery) in 3,335 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization in the current practice of percutaneous coronary revascularization. During the period of observation, the rate of lesions treated successfully increased from 91% to 95% (P < 0.0001), whereas the rate of major adverse events (MACE) decreased from 3.6% to 1.6% (odds ratio [OR], 0.70 per year). Using multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis, cardiogenic shock (OR, 8.59; confidence interval [CI], 4.27-17.27), renal disease (OR, 3.33; CI, 1.95-5.69), evolving myocardial infarction (OR, 2.80; CI, 1.47-5.31), congestive heart failure (OR, 2.18; CI, 1.23-3.86), total number of lesions treated (OR, 1.28; CI, 1.03-1.59), age (OR, 1.03; CI, 1.01-1.06), and history of prior coronary intervention (OR, 0.51; CI 0.26-0.99) were identified as independent predictors of MACE. In addition, vascular disease (OR, 2. 48; CI 1.37-4.50) and unstable angina pectoris (OR, 0.44; CI 0.25-0. 79) were related to adverse events when patients in cardiogenic shock were excluded from the model. With the exception of most unfavorable lesion morphology (AHA/ACC lesion type C; OR, 2.05; CI, 1.19-3.52), anatomic parameters added no further information. In the present era of device technology, success rates of percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures have increased and remain to be determined by lesion morphology. In contrast, the rate of MACE is declining and best predicted by easily identified patient characteristics. Copyright 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10525222     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-726x(199911)48:3<253::aid-ccd3>3.0.co;2-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  2 in total

1.  Staged revascularization in critically ill patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  N J Hayat; K Varghese; C S Thomas; N A Khan
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Angiographic Lesion Complexity Score and In-Hospital Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Ayaka Endo; Akio Kawamura; Hiroaki Miyata; Shigetaka Noma; Masahiro Suzuki; Takashi Koyama; Shiro Ishikawa; Susumu Nakagawa; Shunsuke Takagi; Yohei Numasawa; Keiichi Fukuda; Shun Kohsaka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.