Literature DB >> 10524882

A comparative study of the no scalpel and standard incision approaches to vasectomy in 5 countries. The Male Sterilization Investigator Team.

D Sokal, S McMullen, D Gates, R Dominik.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compare the safety, ease of use and effectiveness of the no scalpel and standard incision approaches to vasectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, partially masked controlled trial was conducted at 8 sites in Brazil, Guatemala, Indonesia, Sri Lanka and Thailand. Semen samples were collected 10 weeks postoperatively and tested to ascertain sterility using verification of no living spermatozoa.
RESULTS: The study included 1,429 men seeking vasectomy. The efficacy of the 2 approaches was virtually identical. In the no scalpel group operating time was significantly shorter, and complications and pain were less frequent than in the standard incision group. The no scalpel group resumed intercourse sooner, probably as a result of less pain following the procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: The no scalpel approach is an important advance in the surgical approach to vasectomy, and offers fewer side effects and greater comfort compared to the standard incision technique, without compromising efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10524882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  12 in total

1.  Vasectomy update 2010.

Authors:  Armand Zini
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy.

Authors:  Lynley A Cook; Asha Pun; Maria F Gallo; Laureen M Lopez; Huib A A M Van Vliet
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-03-30

3.  Vasectomy techniques--need for better occlusion methods.

Authors:  David C Sokal
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  CUA guideline: Vasectomy.

Authors:  Armand Zini; John Grantmyre; Peter Chan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Long-term reproductive consequences of no-scalpel vasectomy in beagles.

Authors:  Yuanfeng Zhang; Xinggang Wang; Zonglin Chen; Xunbin Huang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2012-12-28

Review 6.  [Ischemic testicular necrosis following vasectomy: rare and typical complications of an outpatient procedure].

Authors:  N Rolfes; G Lümmen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Male contraception.

Authors:  Vivek Mathew; Ganapathi Bantwal
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-11

8.  Predictors of no-scalpel vasectomy acceptance in Karimnagar district, Andhra Pradesh.

Authors:  Sameer Valsangkar; Surendranath K Sai; Samir D Bele; Trupti N Bodhare
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-07

9.  Modelling cost-effectiveness of different vasectomy methods in India, Kenya, and Mexico.

Authors:  Yancy Seamans; Claudia M Harner-Jay
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2007-07-13

Review 10.  Vasectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michel Labrecque; Caroline Dufresne; Mark A Barone; Karine St-Hilaire
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2004-05-24       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.